Literature DB >> 22986220

Identification of differentially expressed proteins in direct expressed prostatic secretions of men with organ-confined versus extracapsular prostate cancer.

Yunee Kim1, Vladimir Ignatchenko, Cindy Q Yao, Irina Kalatskaya, Julius O Nyalwidhe, Raymond S Lance, Anthony O Gramolini, Dean A Troyer, Lincoln D Stein, Paul C Boutros, Jeffrey A Medin, O John Semmes, Richard R Drake, Thomas Kislinger.   

Abstract

Current protocols for the screening of prostate cancer cannot accurately discriminate clinically indolent tumors from more aggressive ones. One reliable indicator of outcome has been the determination of organ-confined versus nonorgan-confined disease but even this determination is often only made following prostatectomy. This underscores the need to explore alternate avenues to enhance outcome prediction of prostate cancer patients. Fluids that are proximal to the prostate, such as expressed prostatic secretions (EPS), are attractive sources of potential prostate cancer biomarkers as these fluids likely bathe the tumor. Direct-EPS samples from 16 individuals with extracapsular (n = 8) or organ-confined (n = 8) prostate cancer were used as a discovery cohort, and were analyzed in duplicate by a nine-step MudPIT on a LTQ-Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer. A total of 624 unique proteins were identified by at least two unique peptides with a 0.2% false discovery rate. A semiquantitative spectral counting algorithm identified 133 significantly differentially expressed proteins in the discovery cohort. Integrative data mining prioritized 14 candidates, including two known prostate cancer biomarkers: prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase, which were significantly elevated in the direct-EPS from the organ-confined cancer group. These and five other candidates (SFN, MME, PARK7, TIMP1, and TGM4) were verified by Western blotting in an independent set of direct-EPS from patients with biochemically recurrent disease (n = 5) versus patients with no evidence of recurrence upon follow-up (n = 10). Lastly, we performed proof-of-concept SRM-MS-based relative quantification of the five candidates using unpurified heavy isotope-labeled synthetic peptides spiked into pools of EPS-urines from men with extracapsular and organ-confined prostate tumors. This study represents the first efforts to define the direct-EPS proteome from two major subclasses of prostate cancer using shotgun proteomics and verification in EPS-urine by SRM-MS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986220      PMCID: PMC3518113          DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M112.017889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics        ISSN: 1535-9476            Impact factor:   5.911


  82 in total

1.  The interface between biomarker discovery and clinical validation: The tar pit of the protein biomarker pipeline.

Authors:  Amanda G Paulovich; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Pei Wang
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Exosomes as biomarker treasure chests for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Diederick Duijvesz; Theo Luider; Chris H Bangma; Guido Jenster
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility.

Authors:  Nader Rifai; Michael A Gillette; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  A pipeline that integrates the discovery and verification of plasma protein biomarkers reveals candidate markers for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Terri A Addona; Xu Shi; Hasmik Keshishian; D R Mani; Michael Burgess; Michael A Gillette; Karl R Clauser; Dongxiao Shen; Gregory D Lewis; Laurie A Farrell; Michael A Fifer; Marc S Sabatine; Robert E Gerszten; Steven A Carr
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Reproducible quantification of cancer-associated proteins in body fluids using targeted proteomics.

Authors:  Ruth Hüttenhain; Martin Soste; Nathalie Selevsek; Hannes Röst; Atul Sethi; Christine Carapito; Terry Farrah; Eric W Deutsch; Ulrike Kusebauch; Robert L Moritz; Emma Niméus-Malmström; Oliver Rinner; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis.

Authors:  Guanming Wu; Xin Feng; Lincoln Stein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Synergy in tumor suppression by direct interaction of neutral endopeptidase with PTEN.

Authors:  Makoto Sumitomo; Akira Iwase; Rong Zheng; Daniel Navarro; David Kaminetzky; Ruoqian Shen; Maria-Magdalena Georgescu; David M Nanus
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Neutral endopeptidase protein expression and prognosis in localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Iman Osman; Herman Yee; Samir S Taneja; Benjamin Levinson; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Caroline Chang; Craig Nobert; David M Nanus
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Large-scale and high-confidence proteomic analysis of human seminal plasma.

Authors:  Bartosz Pilch; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  [Proteome-based diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of prostate cancer].

Authors:  J Neuhaus; E Schiffer; J Siwy; F Mannello; L-C Horn; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Seminal plasma as a diagnostic fluid for male reproductive system disorders.

Authors:  Andrei P Drabovich; Punit Saraon; Keith Jarvi; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Multi-omics Biomarker Pipeline Reveals Elevated Levels of Protein-glutamine Gamma-glutamyltransferase 4 in Seminal Plasma of Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Andrei P Drabovich; Punit Saraon; Mikalai Drabovich; Theano D Karakosta; Apostolos Dimitromanolakis; M Eric Hyndman; Keith Jarvi; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  In-depth proteomic analyses of exosomes isolated from expressed prostatic secretions in urine.

Authors:  Simona Principe; E Ellen Jones; Yunee Kim; Ankit Sinha; Julius O Nyalwidhe; Jasmin Brooks; O John Semmes; Dean A Troyer; Raymond S Lance; Thomas Kislinger; Richard R Drake
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 5.  Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a new approach for improvement of early diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Guo-Qiang Liao; Xiao-Fei Wen; Wei-Hua Chen; Sheng Cheng; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Roman Ganzer; Jochen Neuhaus
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2017 Nov.       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  Increased bisecting N-acetylglucosamine and decreased branched chain glycans of N-linked glycoproteins in expressed prostatic secretions associated with prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Julius O Nyalwidhe; Lucy R Betesh; Thomas W Powers; E Ellen Jones; Krista Y White; Tanya C Burch; Jasmin Brooks; Megan T Watson; Raymond S Lance; Dean A Troyer; O John Semmes; Anand Mehta; Richard R Drake
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Targeted glycoprotein enrichment and identification in stromal cell secretomes using azido sugar metabolic labeling.

Authors:  Stephen M Roper; Marina Zemskova; Benjamin A Neely; Arch Martin; Peng Gao; E Ellen Jones; Andrew S Kraft; Richard R Drake
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 8.  Prostasomes as a source of diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carla Zijlstra; Willem Stoorvogel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Overexpression of transglutaminase 4 and prostate cancer progression: a potential predictor of less favourable outcomes.

Authors:  Zhi Cao; Yang Wang; Zhi-Yong Liu; Zhen-Sheng Zhang; Shan-Cheng Ren; Yong-Wei Yu; Meng Qiao; Bei-Bei Zhai; Ying-Hao Sun
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  Prostate Cancer Biomarker Development: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group Review.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Robin J Leach; Martin G Sanda; Oliver J Semmes
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.