Literature DB >> 20540926

A simple model of circadian rhythms based on dimerization and proteolysis of PER and TIM.

J J Tyson1, C I Hong, C D Thron, B Novak.   

Abstract

Many organisms display rhythms of physiology and behavior that are entrained to the 24-h cycle of light and darkness prevailing on Earth. Under constant conditions of illumination and temperature, these internal biological rhythms persist with a period close to 1 day ("circadian"), but it is usually not exactly 24h. Recent discoveries have uncovered stunning similarities among the molecular circuitries of circadian clocks in mice, fruit flies, and bread molds. A consensus picture is coming into focus around two proteins (called PER and TIM in fruit flies), which dimerize and then inhibit transcription of their own genes. Although this picture seems to confirm a venerable model of circadian rhythms based on time-delayed negative feedback, we suggest that just as crucial to the circadian oscillator is a positive feedback loop based on stabilization of PER upon dimerization. These ideas can be expressed in simple mathematical form (phase plane portraits), and the model accounts naturally for several hallmarks of circadian rhythms, including temperature compensation and the per(L) mutant phenotype. In addition, the model suggests how an endogenous circadian oscillator could have evolved from a more primitive, light-activated switch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 20540926      PMCID: PMC1300518          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77078-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  34 in total

1.  Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels.

Authors:  P E Hardin; J C Hall; M Rosbash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Modeling temperature compensation in chemical and biological oscillators.

Authors:  P Ruoff; L Rensing; R Kommedal; S Mohsenzadeh
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Circadian rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster: analysis of period as a function of gene dosage at the per (period) locus.

Authors:  G G Coté; S Brody
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1986-08-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  A model for circadian rhythms in Drosophila incorporating the formation of a complex between the PER and TIM proteins.

Authors:  J C Leloup; A Goldbeter
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.182

5.  Regulation of the Drosophila protein timeless suggests a mechanism for resetting the circadian clock by light.

Authors:  M Hunter-Ensor; A Ousley; A Sehgal
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-03-08       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Role of feedback inhibition in stabilizing the classical operon.

Authors:  R D Bliss; P R Painter; A G Marr
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1982-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim.

Authors:  T K Darlington; K Wager-Smith; M F Ceriani; D Staknis; N Gekakis; T D Steeves; C J Weitz; J S Takahashi; S A Kay
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Loss of circadian behavioral rhythms and per RNA oscillations in the Drosophila mutant timeless.

Authors:  A Sehgal; J L Price; B Man; M W Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A mutant Drosophila homolog of mammalian Clock disrupts circadian rhythms and transcription of period and timeless.

Authors:  R Allada; N E White; W V So; J C Hall; M Rosbash
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  CYCLE is a second bHLH-PAS clock protein essential for circadian rhythmicity and transcription of Drosophila period and timeless.

Authors:  J E Rutila; V Suri; M Le; W V So; M Rosbash; J C Hall
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  62 in total

1.  A reduced model clarifies the role of feedback loops and time delays in the Drosophila circadian oscillator.

Authors:  Paul Smolen; Douglas A Baxter; John H Byrne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures.

Authors:  Jörg Stelling; Ernst Dieter Gilles; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Discreteness-induced concentration inversion in mesoscopic chemical systems.

Authors:  Rajesh Ramaswamy; Nélido González-Segredo; Ivo F Sbalzarini; Ramon Grima
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Modeling the dynamic behavior of biochemical regulatory networks.

Authors:  John J Tyson; Teeraphan Laomettachit; Pavel Kraikivski
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits.

Authors:  Nicolas E Buchler; Ulrich Gerland; Terence Hwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Isochron-based phase response analysis of circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Rudiyanto Gunawan; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A proposal for robust temperature compensation of circadian rhythms.

Authors:  Christian I Hong; Emery D Conrad; John J Tyson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Systems interface biology.

Authors:  Francis J Doyle; Jörg Stelling
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Internal noise-sustained circadian rhythms in a Drosophila model.

Authors:  Qianshu Li; Xiufeng Lang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.