Literature DB >> 12414672

A reduced model clarifies the role of feedback loops and time delays in the Drosophila circadian oscillator.

Paul Smolen1, Douglas A Baxter, John H Byrne.   

Abstract

Although several detailed models of molecular processes essential for circadian oscillations have been developed, their complexity makes intuitive understanding of the oscillation mechanism difficult. The goal of the present study was to reduce a previously developed, detailed model to a minimal representation of the transcriptional regulation essential for circadian rhythmicity in Drosophila. The reduced model contains only two differential equations, each with time delays. A negative feedback loop is included, in which PER protein represses per transcription by binding the dCLOCK transcription factor. A positive feedback loop is also included, in which dCLOCK indirectly enhances its own formation. The model simulated circadian oscillations, light entrainment, and a phase-response curve with qualitative similarities to experiment. Time delays were found to be essential for simulation of circadian oscillations with this model. To examine the robustness of the simplified model to fluctuations in molecule numbers, a stochastic variant was constructed. Robust circadian oscillations and entrainment to light pulses were simulated with fewer than 80 molecules of each gene product present on average. Circadian oscillations persisted when the positive feedback loop was removed. Moreover, elimination of positive feedback did not decrease the robustness of oscillations to stochastic fluctuations or to variations in parameter values. Such reduced models can aid understanding of the oscillation mechanisms in Drosophila and in other organisms in which feedback regulation of transcription may play an important role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12414672      PMCID: PMC1302324          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75249-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  43 in total

1.  Circadian clocks limited by noise.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Delay model of the circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  M A Lema; D A Golombek; J Echave
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  The Drosophila double-timeS mutation delays the nuclear accumulation of period protein and affects the feedback regulation of period mRNA.

Authors:  S Bao; J Rihel; E Bjes; J Y Fan; J L Price
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Characterization of Andante, a new Drosophila clock mutant, and its interactions with other clock mutants.

Authors:  R J Konopka; R F Smith; D Orr
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.250

5.  Phosphorylation of period is influenced by cycling physical associations of double-time, period, and timeless in the Drosophila clock.

Authors:  B Kloss; A Rothenfluh; M W Young; L Saez
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A model for circadian rhythms in Drosophila incorporating the formation of a complex between the PER and TIM proteins.

Authors:  J C Leloup; A Goldbeter
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.182

7.  Mathematics of cellular control processes. I. Negative feedback to one gene.

Authors:  J S Griffith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Model genetic circuits encoding autoregulatory transcription factors.

Authors:  A D Keller
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1995-01-21       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  Chronobiological analysis of a new clock mutant, Toki, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A Matsumoto; T Motoshige; T Murata; K Tomioka; T Tanimura; Y Chiba
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.250

10.  Block in nuclear localization of period protein by a second clock mutation, timeless.

Authors:  L B Vosshall; J L Price; A Sehgal; L Saez; M W Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  29 in total

1.  Robustness properties of circadian clock architectures.

Authors:  Jörg Stelling; Ernst Dieter Gilles; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Design of regulation and dynamics in simple biochemical pathways.

Authors:  Ram Rup Sarkar; R Maithreye; Somdatta Sinha
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Model-driven designs of an oscillating gene network.

Authors:  Lisa M Tuttle; Howard Salis; Jonathan Tomshine; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A model for the circadian rhythm of cyanobacteria that maintains oscillation without gene expression.

Authors:  Gen Kurosawa; Kazuyuki Aihara; Yoh Iwasa
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Optimization of a stochastically simulated gene network model via simulated annealing.

Authors:  Jonathan Tomshine; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Internal noise-sustained circadian rhythms in a Drosophila model.

Authors:  Qianshu Li; Xiufeng Lang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Robust stability of genetic regulatory networks with distributed delay.

Authors:  Wangli He; Jinde Cao
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  The effects of time-varying temperature on delays in genetic networks.

Authors:  Marcella M Gomez; Richard M Murray; Matthew R Bennett
Journal:  SIAM J Appl Dyn Syst       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Dynamics of a minimal model of interlocked positive and negative feedback loops of transcriptional regulation by cAMP-response element binding proteins.

Authors:  Hao Song; Paul Smolen; Evyatar Av-Ron; Douglas A Baxter; John H Byrne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Stochastic simulation of delay-induced circadian rhythms in Drosophila.

Authors:  Zhouyi Xu; Xiaodong Cai
Journal:  EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol       Date:  2009-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.