Literature DB >> 26835491

Prediction of clinical phenotypes in invasive breast carcinomas from the integration of radiomics and genomics data.

Wentian Guo1, Hui Li2, Yitan Zhu3, Li Lan2, Shengjie Yang3, Karen Drukker2, Elizabeth Morris4, Elizabeth Burnside5, Gary Whitman6, Maryellen L Giger2, Yuan Ji7.   

Abstract

Genomic and radiomic imaging profiles of invasive breast carcinomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas and The Cancer Imaging Archive were integrated and a comprehensive analysis was conducted to predict clinical outcomes using the radiogenomic features. Variable selection via LASSO and logistic regression were used to select the most-predictive radiogenomic features for the clinical phenotypes, including pathological stage, lymph node metastasis, and status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Cross-validation with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was employed as the prediction metric. Higher AUCs were obtained in the prediction of pathological stage, ER, and PR status than for lymph node metastasis and HER2 status. Overall, the prediction performances by genomics alone, radiomics alone, and combined radiogenomics features showed statistically significant correlations with clinical outcomes; however, improvement on the prediction performance by combining genomics and radiomics data was not found to be statistically significant, most likely due to the small sample size of 91 cancer cases with 38 radiomic features and 144 genomic features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  The Cancer Genome Atlas; The Cancer Imaging Archive; invasive breast carcinoma; prediction of clinical outcomes; radiogenomics

Year:  2015        PMID: 26835491      PMCID: PMC4718467          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  28 in total

1.  A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Hui Li; Ulrich Bick; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Genome-wide association analysis by lasso penalized logistic regression.

Authors:  Tong Tong Wu; Yi Fang Chen; Trevor Hastie; Eric Sobel; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer.

Authors:  Neha Bhooshan; Maryellen Giger; Darrin Edwards; Yading Yuan; Sanaz Jansen; Hui Li; Li Lan; Husain Sattar; Gillian Newstead
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers.

Authors:  Weijie Chen; Maryellen L Giger; Gillian M Newstead; Ulrich Bick; Sanaz A Jansen; Hui Li; Li Lan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Elizabeth R Gerstner; James M Mountz; Lawrence H Schwartz; Christopher W Ryan; Michael M Graham; John M Buatti; Fiona M Fennessy; Edward A Eikman; Virendra Kumar; Kenneth M Forster; Richard L Wahl; Frank S Lieberman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging.

Authors:  K G Gilhuijs; M L Giger; U Bick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  MapSplice: accurate mapping of RNA-seq reads for splice junction discovery.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Darshan Singh; Zheng Zeng; Stephen J Coleman; Yan Huang; Gleb L Savich; Xiaping He; Piotr Mieczkowski; Sara A Grimm; Charles M Perou; James N MacLeod; Derek Y Chiang; Jan F Prins; Jinze Liu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome.

Authors:  Bo Li; Colin N Dewey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.307

View more
  51 in total

Review 1.  Towards precision medicine: from quantitative imaging to radiomics.

Authors:  U Rajendra Acharya; Yuki Hagiwara; Vidya K Sudarshan; Wai Yee Chan; Kwan Hoong Ng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Jan.       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Heterogeneous Enhancement Patterns of Tumor-adjacent Parenchyma at MR Imaging Are Associated with Dysregulated Signaling Pathways and Poor Survival in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Bailiang Li; Xiaoli Sun; Guohong Cao; Daniel L Rubin; Sandy Napel; Debra M Ikeda; Allison W Kurian; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Novel Quantitative Imaging for Predicting Response to Therapy: Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2018-05-23

4.  USING DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS FOR RADIOGENOMIC ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Nova F Smedley; William Hsu
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-05-24

5.  Imaging-Genomic Study of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Associations Between Radiomic Phenotypes and Genomic Mechanisms via Integration of The Cancer Genome Atlas and The Cancer Imaging Archive.

Authors:  Yitan Zhu; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Stephen Y Lai; Shengjie Yang; Aasheesh Kanwar; Lin Wei; Mona Kamal; Subhajit Sengupta; Hesham Elhalawani; Heath Skinner; Dennis S Mackin; Jay Shiao; Jay Messer; Andrew Wong; Yao Ding; Lifei Zhang; Laurence Court; Yuan Ji; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Masoom A Haider; Maryellen L Giger; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  An Update on the Approach to the Imaging of Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katherine M Mullen; Raymond Y Huang
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Computer-aided diagnosis with radiogenomics: analysis of the relationship between genotype and morphological changes of the brain magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Chiharu Kai; Yoshikazu Uchiyama; Junji Shiraishi; Hiroshi Fujita; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-05-10

9.  Somatic Mutations Drive Distinct Imaging Phenotypes in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Chintan Parmar; Ying Liu; Thibaud P Coroller; Gisele Cruz; Olya Stringfield; Zhaoxiang Ye; Mike Makrigiorgos; Fiona Fennessy; Raymond H Mak; Robert Gillies; John Quackenbush; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtype with MRI Dataset Utilizing Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Simukayi Mutasa; Jenika Karcich; Nishant Gupta; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; John Nemer; Mary Sun; Peter Chang; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.