Literature DB >> 17507720

Breast MR imaging: computer-aided evaluation program for discriminating benign from malignant lesions.

Teresa C Williams1, Wendy B DeMartini, Savannah C Partridge, Sue Peacock, Constance D Lehman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine the sensitivity of kinetic features measured with computer-aided evaluation at breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in discriminating benign from malignant lesions, with histopathologic findings used as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant study. Informed consent was waived. Suspicious breast lesions visible only at MR imaging and in which biopsy had been performed with MR imaging guidance were retrospectively evaluated with a computer-aided evaluation program. Computer-generated kinetic features for each lesion were recorded, and those of benign and malignant lesions were compared. Features analyzed included the presence or absence of computer-aided evaluation "threshold enhancement" at 50% and 100% minimum thresholds; degree of initial peak enhancement; and enhancement profiles composed of lesion percentages of washout, plateau, and persistent enhancement. The Fisher exact test and Student t test were used to assess differences in these analyses.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four consecutive lesions (41 malignant, 113 benign) in 125 women (age range, 27-86 years; mean age, 52 years) were evaluated. The presence of threshold enhancement at computer-aided evaluation was sensitive for malignancy, with 38 of 41 (93%) malignant lesions demonstrating enhancement at both the 50% and 100% thresholds. Absence of threshold enhancement at computer-aided evaluation helped improve the discrimination between benign and malignant lesions when compared with that at initial interpretation by the radiologists. False-positive rates were reduced by 8.8% at the 50% enhancement threshold (not significant) and by 23.0% at the 100% enhancement threshold (P=.02) when compared with that at initial interpretation. Analyses of initial peak enhancement values and enhancement profiles did not demonstrate further improvements in lesion discrimination.
CONCLUSION: The use of computer-aided evaluation for breast MR imaging significantly helped improve the discrimination of benign from malignant lesions when compared with that at initial interpretations by radiologists. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507720     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2441060634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  42 in total

1.  Computer-aided diagnosis of breast DCE-MRI images using bilateral asymmetry of contrast enhancement between two breasts.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Chengjie Zhang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Current Status and New Developments in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Bernhard Krämer; Claus Claussen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Computer-aided evaluation as an adjunct to revised BI-RADS Atlas: improvement in positive predictive value at screening breast MRI.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Nariya Cho; Mirinae Seo; A Jung Chu; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions using magnetization transfer imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Samantha L Heller; Linda Moy; Sherlin Lavianlivi; Melanie Moccaldi; Sungheon Kim
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Comparing performance of the CADstream and the DynaCAD breast MRI CAD systems : CADstream vs. DynaCAD in breast MRI.

Authors:  Joann Pan; Basak E Dogan; Selin Carkaci; Lumarie Santiago; Elsa Arribas; Scott B Cantor; Wei Wei; R Jason Stafford; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Effect of the enhancement threshold on the computer-aided detection of breast cancer using MRI.

Authors:  Jacob E D Levman; Petrina Causer; Ellen Warner; Anne L Martel
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  The adjacent vessel sign on breast MRI: new data and a subgroup analysis for 1,084 histologically verified cases.

Authors:  Matthias Dietzel; Pascal A T Baltzer; Tibor Vag; Aimee Herzog; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Breast DCE-MRI: influence of postcontrast timing on automated lesion kinetics assessments and discrimination of benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Karen M Stone; Roberta M Strigel; Wendy B DeMartini; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Wendy B DeMartini; Nola M Hylton; Benjamin Herman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.