Literature DB >> 20538249

Stapler vs suture closure of pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis.

Wei Zhou1, Ran Lv, Xianfa Wang, Yiping Mou, Xiujun Cai, Ingrid Herr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suture closure and stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy are the techniques used most often. The ideal choice remains a matter of debate.
METHODS: Five bibliographic databases covering 1970 to July 2009 were searched.
RESULTS: Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Stapler closure was performed in 671 patients, while suture closure was conducted in 1,615 patients. The pancreatic fistula rate ranged from 0% to 40.0% for stapler closure of the pancreatic stump and from 9.3% to 45.7% for the suture closure technique. There were no significant difference between the stapler and suture closure groups with respect to the pancreatic fistula formation rate (22.1% vs 31.2%; odds ratio, .85; 95% confidence interval, .66-1.08), although there was a trend toward favoring stapler closure. In 4 studies including 437 patients, stapler closure was associated with a trend (not statistically significant) toward a reduction in intra-abdominal abscess (odds ratio, .53; 95% confidence interval, .24-1.15).
CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences occur between suture and stapler closure with respect to the pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess after distal pancreatectomy, though there is a trend favoring stapler closure.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20538249     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  43 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Bin Huang; Lu Feng; Jichun Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is as safe and feasible as open procedure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kun Xie; Yi-Ping Zhu; Xiao-Wu Xu; Ke Chen; Jia-Fei Yan; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The influence of staple size on fistula formation following distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Jacob Moalem; Eva Galka; Peter Salzman; Luke O Schoeniger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study.

Authors:  Sergio Alfieri; Giovanni Butturini; Ugo Boggi; Andrea Pietrabissa; Luca Morelli; Fabio Vistoli; Isacco Damoli; Andrea Peri; Claudio Fiorillo; Luigi Pugliese; Marco Ramera; Nelide De Lio; Gregorio Di Franco; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Fausto Rosa; Roberta Menghi; Giovanni Battista Doglietto; Giuseppe Quero
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Management of blunt pancreatic trauma: what's new?

Authors:  D A Potoka; B A Gaines; A Leppäniemi; A B Peitzman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  Minireview on laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Clara Tan-Tam; Stephen W Chung
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-03-16

7.  Impact of distal pancreatectomy on outcomes of peritoneal surface disease treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea N Doud; Reese W Randle; Clancy J Clark; Edward A Levine; Katrina R Swett; Perry Shen; John H Stewart; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy.

Authors:  Isamu Makino; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  PolysorbR (an absorbable lactomer) staples, a safe closure technique for distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Gyula Farkas; László Leindler; János Márton; György Lázár; Gyula Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Radiofrequency is a secure and effective method for pancreatic transection in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results of a randomized, controlled trial in an experimental model.

Authors:  Dimitri Dorcaratto; Fernando Burdío; Dolors Fondevila; Anna Andaluz; Rita Quesada; Ignasi Poves; Marta Caceres; Xavier Mayol; Enrique Berjano; Luis Grande
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.