Literature DB >> 23584822

Radiofrequency is a secure and effective method for pancreatic transection in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results of a randomized, controlled trial in an experimental model.

Dimitri Dorcaratto1, Fernando Burdío, Dolors Fondevila, Anna Andaluz, Rita Quesada, Ignasi Poves, Marta Caceres, Xavier Mayol, Enrique Berjano, Luis Grande.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (PPF) is the most frequent and serious complication after laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). Our goal was to compare the performance, in terms of PPF prevention, and safety of a radiofrequency (RF)-assisted transection device versus a stapler device in a porcine LDP model.
METHODS: Thirty-two animals were randomly divided into two groups to perform LDP using a RF-assisted device (RF group; n = 16) and stapler device (ST group; n = 16) and necropsied 4 weeks after surgery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PPF. Secondary endpoints were surgery/transection time, intra/postoperative complications/deaths, postoperative plasmatic amylase and glucose concentration, peritoneal liquid amylase and interleukin 6 (IL-6) concentrations, weight variations, and histopathological changes.
RESULTS: Two clinical and one biochemical PPF were observed in the ST and RF groups respectively. Peritoneal amylase concentration was significantly higher in the RF group 4 days after surgery, but this difference was no longer present at necropsy. Both groups presented a significant decrease in peritoneal IL-6 concentration during the postoperative follow-up, with no differences between the groups. RF group animals showed a higher postoperative weight gain. In the histopathological exam, all RF group animals showed a common pattern of central coagulative necrosis of the parenchymal surface, surrounded by a thick fibrosis, which sealed main and secondary pancreatic ducts and was not found in ST group.
CONCLUSIONS: The fibrosis caused by an RF-assisted device can be at least as safe and effective as stapler compression to achieve pancreatic parenchyma sealing in a porcine LDP model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23584822     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2952-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  46 in total

Review 1.  Cytokine storm in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Rohit Makhija; Andrew N Kingsnorth
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2002

Review 2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghunandan Venkat; Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick; Anne O Lidor; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe R Nigri; Alan S Rosman; Niccolò Petrucciani; Alessandro Fancellu; Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Giovanni Ramacciato; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Radiofrequency ablation in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P Hadjicostas; N Malakounides; C Varianos; E Kitiris; F Lerni; P Symeonides
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

6.  Single-center experience of laparoscopic left pancreatic resection in 359 consecutive patients: changing the surgical paradigm of left pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Jae Berm Park; Young Hoon Kim; Young Soo Jung; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung-Koo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sang Soo Lee; Do Hyun Park; Duck Jong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Interleukin-6 in the injured patient. Marker of injury or mediator of inflammation?

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; F A Moore; V M Peterson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Abdominal surgical interventions: local and systemic consequences for the immune system--a prospective study on elective gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Dorothee Decker; Rene Tolba; Wolfram Springer; Holger Lauschke; Andreas Hirner; Alexander von Ruecker
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Precoagulation minimizes blood loss during standardized hepatic resection in an experimental model.

Authors:  B Fioole; J D W van der Bilt; S G Elias; J de Hoog; I H M Borel Rinkes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation of the main pancreatic duct is a secure and effective method to produce pancreatic atrophy and to achieve stump closure.

Authors:  Anna Andaluz; Elzbieta Ewertowska; Xavier Moll; Adrià Aguilar; Félix García; Dolors Fondevila; Rita Quesada; Enrique Berjano; Luís Grande; Fernando Burdío
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Radiofrequency-assisted transection of the pancreas vs stapler in distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  E Pueyo-Périz; C Téllez-Marquès; A Radosevic; O Morató; L Visa; L Ilzarbe; E Berjano; E de Vicente; I Poves; B Ielpo; L Grande; F Burdío; P Sánchez-Velázquez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.