Literature DB >> 20537743

Corticomotor excitability of wrist flexor and extensor muscles during active and passive movement.

Lilian Chye1, Ken Nosaka, Lynda Murray, Dylan Edwards, Gary Thickbroom.   

Abstract

The excitability of the corticospinal projection to upper and lower limbs is constantly modulated during voluntary and passive movement; however a direct comparison during a comparable movement has not been reported. In the present study we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to compare corticomotor excitability to the extensor and flexor carpi radialis (ECR/FCR) muscles of the forearm during voluntary rhythmic wrist movement (through 45 degrees of range), during a matched (for range and rhythm) passive movement of the wrist, and while the wrist was stationary (in mid-range). TMS was delivered when the wrist was in the neutral position. With passive and active movement, and for both FCR and ECR, corticomotor excitability was reduced during lengthening relative to shortening phases of movement. With active movement, this pattern was maintained and superimposed on an overall increase in excitability to both muscles that was greater for the ECR. The results favor a common pattern of excitability changes shared by extensor and flexor muscles as they undergo lengthening and shortening, which may be mediated by afferent input during both passive and active movement. This is combined with an overall increase in excitability associated with active movement that is greater for extensor muscles perhaps due to differences in the strength of the corticomotor projection to these muscles. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537743     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  18 in total

1.  New evidence of corticospinal network modulation induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cortical effects of repetitive finger flexion- vs. extension-resisted tracking movements: a TMS study.

Authors:  Sasha B Godfrey; Peter S Lum; Evan Chan; Michelle L Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Is the joint-angle specificity of isometric resistance training real? And if so, does it have a neural basis?

Authors:  Marcel B Lanza; Thomas G Balshaw; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Ipsilateral motor cortical responses to TMS during lengthening and shortening of the contralateral wrist flexors.

Authors:  Glyn Howatson; Mathew B Taylor; Patrick Rider; Binal R Motawar; Michael P McNally; Stanislaw Solnik; Paul DeVita; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  The corticomotor projection to liminally-contractable forearm muscles in chronic spinal cord injury: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  M Cortes; G W Thickbroom; J Elder; A Rykman; J Valls-Sole; A Pascual-Leone; D J Edwards
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  NeuroMeasure: A Software Package for Quantification of Cortical Motor Maps Using Frameless Stereotaxic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Michael B Gerber; Alasdair C McLean; Samuel J Stephen; Alex G Chalco; Usman M Arshad; Gary W Thickbroom; Josh Silverstein; K Zoe Tsagaris; Amy Kuceyeski; Kathleen Friel; Taiza E G Santos; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  Reversal of TMS-induced motor twitch by training is associated with a reduction in excitability of the antagonist muscle.

Authors:  Viola Giacobbe; Bruce T Volpe; Gary W Thickbroom; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Hermano I Krebs; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Continuous passive movement does not influence motor maps in healthy adults.

Authors:  Michelle N McDonnell; Susan L Hillier; George M Opie; Matthew Nowosilskyj; Miranda Haberfield; Gabrielle Todd
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The modulatory effect of electrical stimulation on the excitability of the corticospinal tract varies according to the type of muscle contraction being performed.

Authors:  Kei Saito; Kenichi Sugawara; Shota Miyaguchi; Takuya Matsumoto; Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Movement-generated afference paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation: an associative stimulation paradigm.

Authors:  Dylan J Edwards; Laura Dipietro; Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Ana H Medeiros; Gary W Thickbroom; Francis L Mastaglia; Hermano I Krebs; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.