Literature DB >> 26719089

New evidence of corticospinal network modulation induced by motor imagery.

Sidney Grosprêtre1, Florent Lebon2, Charalambos Papaxanthis2, Alain Martin2.   

Abstract

Motor imagery (MI) is the mental simulation of movement, without the corresponding muscle contraction. Whereas the activation of cortical motor areas during MI is established, the involvement of spinal structures is still under debate. We used original and complementary techniques to probe the influence of MI on spinal structures. Amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), cervico-medullary-evoked potentials (CMEPs), and Hoffmann (H)-reflexes of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle and of the triceps surae muscles was measured in young, healthy subjects at rest and during MI. Participants were asked to imagine maximal voluntary contraction of the wrist and ankle, while the targeted limb was fixed (static condition). We confirmed previous studies with an increase of FCR MEPs during MI compared with rest. Interestingly, CMEPs, but not H-reflexes, also increased during MI, revealing a possible activation of subcortical structures. Then, to investigate the effect of MI on the spinal network, we used two techniques: 1) passive lengthening of the targeted muscle via an isokinetic dynamometer and 2) conditioning of H-reflexes with stimulation of the antagonistic nerve. Both techniques activate spinal inhibitory presynaptic circuitry, reducing the H-reflex amplitude at rest. In contrast, no reduction of H-reflex amplitude was observed during MI. These findings suggest that MI has modulatory effects on the spinal neuronal network. Specifically, the activation of low-threshold spinal structures during specific conditions (lengthening and H-reflex conditioning) highlights the possible generation of subliminal cortical output during MI.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H-reflex; cervico-medullar-evoked potential; motor-evoked potential; muscle lengthening; presynaptic inhibition; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26719089      PMCID: PMC4808134          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00952.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  56 in total

1.  H-reflex modulation during passive lengthening and shortening of the human triceps surae.

Authors:  G J Pinniger; M Nordlund; J R Steele; A G Cresswell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Corticomotor excitability of wrist flexor and extensor muscles during active and passive movement.

Authors:  Lilian Chye; Ken Nosaka; Lynda Murray; Dylan Edwards; Gary Thickbroom
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Motor imagery of phasic thumb abduction temporally and spatially modulates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

5.  Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-07

6.  Kinesthetic motor imagery and spinal excitability: the effect of contraction intensity and spatial localization.

Authors:  Patrick M Cowley; Brian C Clark; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Facilitation of quadriceps motoneurones by group I afferents from pretibial flexors in man. 1. Possible interneuronal pathway.

Authors:  R Forget; R Pantieri; E Pierrot-Deseilligny; M Shindo; R Tanaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Motor imagery and cortico-spinal excitability: A review.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Célia Ruffino; Florent Lebon
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.050

9.  Reflex excitability of human soleus motoneurones during voluntary shortening or lengthening contractions.

Authors:  C Romanò; M Schieppati
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Low-threshold primary afferent drive onto GABAergic interneurons in the superficial dorsal horn of the mouse.

Authors:  Claire A Daniele; Amy B MacDermott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  17 in total

1.  The influence of imagery capacity in motor performance improvement.

Authors:  Célia Ruffino; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Florent Lebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spinal plasticity with motor imagery practice.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Effects and Dose-Response Relationships of Motor Imagery Practice on Strength Development in Healthy Adult Populations: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Armin H Paravlic; Maamer Slimani; David Tod; Uros Marusic; Zoran Milanovic; Rado Pisot
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The Neural Specificity of Movement Preparation During Actual and Imagined Movements.

Authors:  Florent Lebon; Célia Ruffino; Ian Greenhouse; Ludovica Labruna; Richard B Ivry; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Does partial activation of the neuromuscular system induce cross-education training effect? Case of a pilot study on motor imagery and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Amandine Bouguetoch; Alain Martin; Sidney Grosprêtre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Change in Reciprocal Inhibition of the Forearm with Motor Imagery among Patients with Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Michiyuki Kawakami; Kohei Okuyama; Yoko Takahashi; Miho Hiramoto; Atsuko Nishimura; Junichi Ushiba; Toshiyuki Fujiwara; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Corticospinal and Spinal Excitabilities Are Modulated during Motor Imagery Associated with Somatosensory Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  E Traverse; F Lebon; A Martin
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results.

Authors:  Kohei Okuyama; Miho Ogura; Michiyuki Kawakami; Kengo Tsujimoto; Kohsuke Okada; Kazuma Miwa; Yoko Takahashi; Kaoru Abe; Shigeo Tanabe; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Meigen Liu
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 6.570

10.  Comparison of the on-line effects of different motor simulation conditions on corticospinal excitability in healthy participants.

Authors:  C Pfenninger; S Grosprêtre; A Remontet; T Lapole
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.