Literature DB >> 31105546

NeuroMeasure: A Software Package for Quantification of Cortical Motor Maps Using Frameless Stereotaxic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Michael B Gerber1, Alasdair C McLean1, Samuel J Stephen1, Alex G Chalco1, Usman M Arshad1, Gary W Thickbroom2, Josh Silverstein2, K Zoe Tsagaris2, Amy Kuceyeski3, Kathleen Friel4,5, Taiza E G Santos6, Dylan J Edwards7,8.   

Abstract

The recent enhanced sophistication of non-invasive mapping of the human motor cortex using MRI-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) techniques, has not been matched by refinement of methods for generating maps from motor evoked potential (MEP) data, or in quantifying map features. This is despite continued interest in understanding cortical reorganization for natural adaptive processes such as skill learning, or in the case of motor recovery, such as after lesion affecting the corticospinal system. With the observation that TMS-MEP map calculation and quantification methods vary, and that no readily available commercial or free software exists, we sought to establish and make freely available a comprehensive software package that advances existing methods, and could be helpful to scientists and clinician-researchers. Therefore, we developed NeuroMeasure, an open source interactive software application for the analysis of TMS motor cortex mapping data collected from Nexstim® and BrainSight®, two commonly used neuronavigation platforms. NeuroMeasure features four key innovations designed to improve motor mapping analysis: de-dimensionalization of the mapping data, fitting a predictive model, reporting measurements to characterize the motor map, and comparing those measurements between datasets. This software provides a powerful and easy to use workflow for characterizing and comparing motor maps generated with neuronavigated TMS. The software can be downloaded on our github page: https://github.com/EdwardsLabNeuroSci/NeuroMeasure. AIM: This paper aims to describe a software platform for quantifying and comparing maps of the human primary motor cortex, using neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation, for the purpose of studying brain plasticity in health and disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain mapping; motor cortex; neuroimaging; software package; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31105546      PMCID: PMC6499165          DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2019.00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neuroinform        ISSN: 1662-5196            Impact factor:   4.081


  26 in total

1.  A model of the effect of MEP amplitude variation on the accuracy of TMS mapping.

Authors:  G W Thickbroom; M L Byrnes; F L Mastaglia
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Corticomotor excitability of wrist flexor and extensor muscles during active and passive movement.

Authors:  Lilian Chye; Ken Nosaka; Lynda Murray; Dylan Edwards; Gary Thickbroom
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; L M McShane; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

4.  An integrative transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping technique using non-linear curve fitting.

Authors:  Alexandra S Kohl; Adriana Bastos Conforto; Werner J Z'Graggen; Alain Kaelin-Lang
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Systematic assessment of training-induced changes in corticospinal output to hand using frameless stereotaxic transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kleim; Erin D Kleim; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping: a model based on spline interpolation.

Authors:  D Borghetti; F Sartucci; E Petacchi; A Guzzetta; M F Piras; L Murri; G Cioni
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Nikolai H Jung; Igor Delvendahl; Nicola G Kuhnke; Dieter Hauschke; Sabine Stolle; Volker Mall
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Variability of motor cortical excitability using a novel mapping procedure.

Authors:  Andrew E Littmann; Colleen L McHenry; Richard K Shields
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Optogenetic approaches for functional mouse brain mapping.

Authors:  Diana H Lim; Jeffrey Ledue; Majid H Mohajerani; Matthieu P Vanni; Timothy H Murphy
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Muscles in "concert": study of primary motor cortex upper limb functional topography.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Melgari; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Flavia Pauri; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.