Literature DB >> 20537630

The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender.

Samer Alfarawati1, Elpida Fragouli, Pere Colls, John Stevens, Cristina Gutiérrez-Mateo, William B Schoolcraft, Mandy G Katz-Jaffe, Dagan Wells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess correlation between blastocyst morphology and chromosomal status.
DESIGN: Observational research study.
SETTING: An IVF clinic and a specialist preimplanation genetic diagnosis (PGD) laboratory. PATIENT(S): Ninety-three couples undergoing IVF treatment in combination with chromosome screening of embryos. INTERVENTION(S): Five hundred blastocysts underwent trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The morphology of the embryos was evaluated using standard methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Association of aneuploidy and morphologic score. RESULT(S): A total of 56.7% of blastocysts were aneuploid. One-half of the grade 5/6 blastocysts were euploid, compared with only 37.5% of embryos graded 1/2, suggesting an effect of aneuploidy on blastocyst development. Aneuploidy also had a negative effect on inner cell mass and trophectoderm grades. Morphologically poor blastocysts had a higher incidence of monosomy and abnormalities affecting several chromosomes. The gender ratio was significantly skewed in relation to morphology. A total of 72% of blastocysts attaining the highest morphologic scores (5AA and 6AA) were found to be male, compared with only 40% of grade 3 embryos. CONCLUSION(S): Morphology and aneuploidy are linked at the blastocyst stage. However, the association is weak, and consequently, morphologic analysis cannot be relied on to ensure transfer of chromosomally normal embryos. A significant proportion of aneuploid embryos are capable of achieving the highest morphologic scores, and some euploid embryos are of poor morphology. Gender was associated with blastocyst grading, male embryos developing at a significantly faster rate than females.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20537630     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  117 in total

1.  A greater number of euploid blastocysts in a given cohort predicts excellent outcomes in single embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Scott Morin; Katherine Melzer-Ross; David McCulloh; Jamie Grifo; Santiago Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Monogenic Disorders: the Value of Concurrent Aneuploidy Screening.

Authors:  Kara N Goldman; Taraneh Nazem; Alan Berkeley; Steven Palter; Jamie A Grifo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Polar bodies are efficient donors for reconstruction of human embryos for potential mitochondrial replacement therapy.

Authors:  Keliang Wu; Cuiqing Zhong; Tailai Chen; Xiaoyu Zhang; Wenrong Tao; Jingye Zhang; Hongchang Li; Han Zhao; Jinsong Li; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Erica Anspach Will; Alison Bartolucci; John Nulsen; Claudio Benadiva; Lawrence Engmann
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology.

Authors:  Ange Wang; Jonathan Kort; Barry Behr; Lynn M Westphal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Correlation between morphokinetic parameters and standard morphological assessment: what can we predict from early embryo development? A time-lapse-based experiment with 2085 blastocysts.

Authors:  Catherine Jacobs; Mariana Nicolielo; Renata Erberelli; Fabiana Mendez; Marina Fanelli; Livia Cremonesi; Beatriz Aiello; Aline R Lorenzon
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-07-14

9.  Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Oleksii O Barash; Kristen A Ivani; Susan P Willman; Evan M Rosenbluth; Deborah S Wachs; Mary D Hinckley; Sara Pittenger Reid; Louis N Weckstein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Quantitative and qualitative trophectoderm grading allows for prediction of live birth and gender.

Authors:  Thomas Ebner; Katja Tritscher; Richard B Mayer; Peter Oppelt; Hans-Christoph Duba; Maria Maurer; Gudrun Schappacher-Tilp; Erwin Petek; Omar Shebl
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.