Literature DB >> 16147604

Do women know that prenatal testing detects fetuses with Down syndrome?

A M Jaques1, J L Halliday, R J Bell.   

Abstract

This questionnaire-based study in Victoria, Australia, examined the responses of pregnant women, aged 37 years and over, to a question about what they expected prenatal testing (screening and/or diagnosis) for birth defects to tell them about their pregnancy. Content analysis showed that, of the 432 tested women, 61.3% mentioned Down syndrome, chromosomal abnormalities or trisomies. Women undergoing both screening and diagnosis were more likely than those having one or other test to mention Down syndrome (adjusted OR = 1.6, P = 0.06), having adjusted for age, marital status, education, residence and parity. Similarly, those from an English-speaking background were more likely to mention Down syndrome, etc. compared to women from a non-English-speaking background (adjusted OR = 3.5, P < 0.001). Down syndrome, a fundamental piece of information about prenatal tests, was not mentioned in nearly 40% of women's responses. This suggests that pregnant women need clearer information about prenatal testing, including the conditions that might be detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16147604     DOI: 10.1080/01443610400007885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  8 in total

1.  Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Mareike Stiel; Jacky Boivin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Grace Ames; Sylvia Ann Metcalfe; Alison Dalton Archibald; Rony Emily Duncan; Jon Emery
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  A randomized trial of a prenatal genetic testing interactive computerized information aid.

Authors:  Lynn M Yee; Michael Wolf; Rebecca Mullen; Ashley R Bergeron; Stacy Cooper Bailey; Robert Levine; William A Grobman
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Evaluation of a decision aid for prenatal testing of fetal abnormalities: a cluster randomised trial [ISRCTN22532458].

Authors:  Cate Nagle; Sharon Lewis; Bettina Meiser; Sylvia Metcalfe; John B Carlin; Robin Bell; Jane Gunn; Jane Halliday
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Offering fragile X syndrome carrier screening: a prospective mixed-methods observational study comparing carrier screening of pregnant and non-pregnant women in the general population.

Authors:  M Martyn; V Anderson; A Archibald; R Carter; J Cohen; M Delatycki; S Donath; J Emery; J Halliday; M Hill; L Sheffield; H Slater; F Tassone; S Younie; S Metcalfe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Attitude, knowledge and informed choice towards prenatal screening for Down Syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Melania Elena Pop-Tudose; Dana Popescu-Spineni; Petru Armean; Ioan Victor Pop
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Multisite assessment of the impact of a prenatal testing educational App on patient knowledge and preparedness for prenatal testing decision making.

Authors:  Patricia Winters; Kirsten J Curnow; Alexandra Benachi; Maria Mar Gil; Belen Santacruz; Miyuki Nishiyama; Fuyuki Hasegawa; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-06-10

8.  Exploring general practitioners' experience of informing women about prenatal screening tests for foetal abnormalities: a qualitative focus group study.

Authors:  Cate Nagle; Sharon Lewis; Bettina Meiser; Jane Gunn; Jane Halliday; Robin Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.