Literature DB >> 17602371

Individual risk of fetal loss following routine second trimester amniocentesis: a controlled study of 20,460 cases.

P Kozlowski1, A Knippel, R Stressig.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of maternal risk factors on excess fetal loss related to amniocentesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared fetal outcome and details of risk factors for fetal loss in 20,460 patients undergoing amniocenteses between April 1997 and March 2005 to 11,017 controls given ultrasound during the same period in our tertiary level prenatal unit. The risk factors were recorded before the procedure. Spontaneous fetal loss was defined as spontaneous miscarriage and intrauterine fetal demise at any gestational age.
RESULTS: The excess rate of spontaneous loss attributed to the amniocentesis procedure averaged 0.49 % (CI: 0.26 - 0.72) for all pregnancies under routine care (1.31 % 268/20,460 versus 0.82 % 90/11,017). The fetal loss rate was increased in the intervention group for the following isolated risk factors: vaginal bleeding before procedure (19/647, 2.9 % CI: 1.6 - 4.2 %); vaginal bleeding at date of procedure (3/33, 9.1 % CI: - 0.7 - 18.9 %); a history of 3 or more spontaneous abortions (6/257, 2.3 % CI: 0.5 - 4.2 %); body mass index > 40 (5/160, 3.1 % CI: 0.4 - 5.8 %) and cigarette consumption > 10/day (13/671, 1.94 % CI: 0.9 - 3.0). If none of these risk factors was present, the abortion rate in the intervention group was 1.18 % (219/18,617) and 0.63 % (61/9,677) in the control group. Maternal age > 40 at birth did not alter the rate of loss in the intervention group, but did in the control group (1.4 % 38/2,717 and 1.69 % 7/414).
CONCLUSION: After routine amniocentesis patients have an additional procedure-related risk of spontaneous pregnancy loss equivalent to 0.5 %. The absence of risk factors in the patient's history does not reduce this additional risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17602371     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-963217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultraschall Med        ISSN: 0172-4614            Impact factor:   6.548


  6 in total

1.  Information and decision support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: interviews with pregnant women and health professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Anne Durand; Mareike Stiel; Jacky Boivin; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Assessment of Foetal DNA in Maternal Blood - A Useful Tool in the Hands of Prenatal Specialists.

Authors:  K O Kagan; M Hoopmann; P Kozlowski
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 3.  The Association of Inflammatory Biomarker of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Spontaneous Preterm Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sina Vakili; Parham Torabinavid; Reza Tabrizi; Alireza Shojazadeh; Nasrin Asadi; Kamran Hessami
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.711

4.  Prevention of lysosomal storage diseases and derivation of mutant stem cell lines by preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Gheona Altarescu; Rachel Beeri; Rachel Eiges; Silvina Epsztejn-Litman; Talia Eldar-Geva; Deborah Elstein; Ari Zimran; Ehud J Margalioth; Ephrat Levy-Lahad; Paul Renbaum
Journal:  Mol Biol Int       Date:  2012-12-26

5.  Noninvasive prenatal detection for pathogenic CNVs: the application in α-thalassemia.

Authors:  Huijuan Ge; Xuan Huang; Xuchao Li; Shengpei Chen; Jing Zheng; Haojun Jiang; Chunlei Zhang; Xiaoyu Pan; Jing Guo; Fang Chen; Ning Chen; Qun Fang; Hui Jiang; Wei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Reproductive options for families at risk of Osteogenesis Imperfecta: a review.

Authors:  Lidiia Zhytnik; Kadri Simm; Andres Salumets; Maire Peters; Aare Märtson; Katre Maasalu
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.123

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.