AIMS: To demonstrate and quantify the dynamic remodelling process of soft drusen resorption and new drusen formation in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with novel interactive methods. METHODS: Twenty patients with large soft drusen bilaterally and without advanced AMD were imaged at baseline and again at a mean interval of 2 years (40 eyes, 80 images). Each of the 40 serial pairs of images was precisely registered by an automated technique. The drusen were segmented by a user-interactive method based on a background levelling algorithm and classified into three groups: new drusen (only in the final image), resorbed drusen (present initially but not in the final image) and stable drusen (present in both images). We measured each of these classes as well as the absolute change in drusen |D1-D0| and the dynamic drusen activity (creation and resorption) D(new)+D(resorbed). RESULTS: Mean dynamic activity for the right eye (OD) was 7.33±5.50%, significantly greater than mean absolute change (2.71±2.89%, p=0.0002, t test), with similar results for the left eye (OS). However, dynamic activity OD compared with OS (mean 7.33±5.50 vs 7.91±4.16%, NS) and absolute net change OD versus OS (2.71±2.89 vs 3.46±3.97%, NS) tended to be symmetrical between fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic remodelling processes of drusen resorption and new drusen formation are distinct disease activities that can occur simultaneously and are not captured by change in total drusen load. Dynamic changes occur at rates more than twice that of net changes, and may be a useful marker of disease activity.
AIMS: To demonstrate and quantify the dynamic remodelling process of soft drusen resorption and new drusen formation in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) with novel interactive methods. METHODS: Twenty patients with large soft drusen bilaterally and without advanced AMD were imaged at baseline and again at a mean interval of 2 years (40 eyes, 80 images). Each of the 40 serial pairs of images was precisely registered by an automated technique. The drusen were segmented by a user-interactive method based on a background levelling algorithm and classified into three groups: new drusen (only in the final image), resorbed drusen (present initially but not in the final image) and stable drusen (present in both images). We measured each of these classes as well as the absolute change in drusen |D1-D0| and the dynamic drusen activity (creation and resorption) D(new)+D(resorbed). RESULTS: Mean dynamic activity for the right eye (OD) was 7.33±5.50%, significantly greater than mean absolute change (2.71±2.89%, p=0.0002, t test), with similar results for the left eye (OS). However, dynamic activity OD compared with OS (mean 7.33±5.50 vs 7.91±4.16%, NS) and absolute net change OD versus OS (2.71±2.89 vs 3.46±3.97%, NS) tended to be symmetrical between fellow eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic remodelling processes of drusen resorption and new drusen formation are distinct disease activities that can occur simultaneously and are not captured by change in total drusen load. Dynamic changes occur at rates more than twice that of net changes, and may be a useful marker of disease activity.
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jan P Koniarek; Jackie Chan; Takayuki Nagasaki; Janet R Sparrow; Kevin Langton Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jackie K Chan; Mihai Busuoic; Vasuki Sivagnanavel; Alan C Bird; N Victor Chong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Nuno L Gomes; Gaetano Barile; Mihai Busuioc; Noah Lee; Andrew Laine Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-04-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Patrick A Kaszubski; Tal Ben Ami; Céline Saade; Camellia Nabati; Vivek Kumar; Ana Rita Santos; Rufino Silva; Maria Luz Cachulo; José G Cunha-Vaz; R Theodore Smith Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Yuhua Zhang; Xiaolin Wang; Pooja Godara; Tianjiao Zhang; Mark E Clark; C Douglas Witherspoon; Richard F Spaide; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio Journal: Retina Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Giuseppe Querques; Bénédicte M J Merle; Nicole M Pumariega; Pascale Benlian; Cécile Delcourt; Alain Zourdani; Heather B Leisy; Michele D Lee; R Theodore Smith; Eric H Souied Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Mahsa A Sohrab; Nicole M Pumariega; Kanika Mathur; Raymond Haans; Anna Blonska; Karl Uy; Dominiek Despriet; Caroline Klaver Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-01
Authors: Zohar Yehoshua; Fenghua Wang; Philip J Rosenfeld; Fernando M Penha; William J Feuer; Giovanni Gregori Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-07-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Joanna M S Davies; Josiane Cillard; Bertrand Friguet; Enrique Cadenas; Jean Cadet; Rachael Cayce; Andrew Fishmann; David Liao; Anne-Laure Bulteau; Frédéric Derbré; Amélie Rébillard; Steven Burstein; Etienne Hirsch; Robert A Kloner; Michael Jakowec; Giselle Petzinger; Delphine Sauce; Florian Sennlaub; Isabelle Limon; Fulvio Ursini; Matilde Maiorino; Christina Economides; Christian J Pike; Pinchas Cohen; Anne Negre Salvayre; Matthew R Halliday; Adam J Lundquist; Nicolaus A Jakowec; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou; Mathias Mericskay; Jean Mariani; Zhenlin Li; David Huang; Ellsworth Grant; Henry J Forman; Caleb E Finch; Patrick Y Sun; Laura C D Pomatto; Onnik Agbulut; David Warburton; Christian Neri; Mustapha Rouis; Pierre Cillard; Jacqueline Capeau; Jean Rosenbaum; Kelvin J A Davies Journal: Geroscience Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 7.713
Authors: Mark J J P van Grinsven; Thomas Theelen; Leonard Witkamp; Job van der Heijden; Johannes P H van de Ven; Carel B Hoyng; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Brian C Toy; Nupura Krishnadev; Maanasa Indaram; Denise Cunningham; Catherine A Cukras; Emily Y Chew; Wai T Wong Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Monica B Sevilla; Gerald McGwin; Eleonora M Lad; Mark Clark; Eric L Yuan; Sina Farsiu; Christine A Curcio; Cynthia Owsley; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 5.258