BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the most prevalent cause of visual loss in patients older than 60 years in the United States. Observation of drusen is the hallmark finding in the clinical evaluation of ARMD. OBJECTIVES: To segment and quantify drusen found in patients with ARMD using image analysis and to compare the efficacy of image analysis segmentation with that of stereoscopic manual grading of drusen. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University referral center.Patients Photographs were randomly selected from an available database of patients with known ARMD in the ongoing Columbia University Macular Genetics Study. All patients were white and older than 60 years. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty images from 17 patients were selected as representative of common manifestations of drusen. Image preprocessing included automated color balancing and, where necessary, manual segmentation of confounding lesions such as geographic atrophy (3 images). The operator then chose among 3 automated processing options suggested by predominant drusen type. Automated processing consisted of elimination of background variability by a mathematical model and subsequent histogram-based threshold selection. A retinal specialist using a graphic tablet while viewing stereo pairs constructed digital drusen drawings for each image. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity and specificity of drusen segmentation using the automated method with respect to manual stereoscopic drusen drawings were calculated on a rigorous pixel-by-pixel basis. RESULTS: The median sensitivity and specificity of automated segmentation were 70% and 81%, respectively. After preprocessing and option choice, reproducibility of automated drusen segmentation was necessarily 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Automated drusen segmentation can be reliably performed on digital fundus photographs and result in successful quantification of drusen in a more precise manner than is traditionally possible with manual stereoscopic grading of drusen. With only minor preprocessing requirements, this automated detection technique may dramatically improve our ability to monitor drusen in ARMD.
BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) is the most prevalent cause of visual loss in patients older than 60 years in the United States. Observation of drusen is the hallmark finding in the clinical evaluation of ARMD. OBJECTIVES: To segment and quantify drusen found in patients with ARMD using image analysis and to compare the efficacy of image analysis segmentation with that of stereoscopic manual grading of drusen. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University referral center.Patients Photographs were randomly selected from an available database of patients with known ARMD in the ongoing Columbia University Macular Genetics Study. All patients were white and older than 60 years. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty images from 17 patients were selected as representative of common manifestations of drusen. Image preprocessing included automated color balancing and, where necessary, manual segmentation of confounding lesions such as geographic atrophy (3 images). The operator then chose among 3 automated processing options suggested by predominant drusen type. Automated processing consisted of elimination of background variability by a mathematical model and subsequent histogram-based threshold selection. A retinal specialist using a graphic tablet while viewing stereo pairs constructed digital drusen drawings for each image. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity and specificity of drusen segmentation using the automated method with respect to manual stereoscopic drusen drawings were calculated on a rigorous pixel-by-pixel basis. RESULTS: The median sensitivity and specificity of automated segmentation were 70% and 81%, respectively. After preprocessing and option choice, reproducibility of automated drusen segmentation was necessarily 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Automated drusen segmentation can be reliably performed on digital fundus photographs and result in successful quantification of drusen in a more precise manner than is traditionally possible with manual stereoscopic grading of drusen. With only minor preprocessing requirements, this automated detection technique may dramatically improve our ability to monitor drusen in ARMD.
Authors: F G Holz; T J Wolfensberger; B Piguet; M Gross-Jendroska; J A Wells; D C Minassian; I H Chisholm; A C Bird Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Gwenole Quellec; Stephen R Russell; Johanna M Seddon; Robyn Reynolds; Todd Scheetz; Vinit B Mahajan; Edwin M Stone; Michael D Abràmoff Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-11-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Giuseppe Querques; Bénédicte M J Merle; Nicole M Pumariega; Pascale Benlian; Cécile Delcourt; Alain Zourdani; Heather B Leisy; Michele D Lee; R Theodore Smith; Eric H Souied Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Mahsa A Sohrab; Nicole M Pumariega; Kanika Mathur; Raymond Haans; Anna Blonska; Karl Uy; Dominiek Despriet; Caroline Klaver Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-01
Authors: Hossein Rabbani; Michael J Allingham; Priyatham S Mettu; Scott W Cousins; Sina Farsiu Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Nieraj Jain; Sina Farsiu; Aziz A Khanifar; Srilaxmi Bearelly; R Theodore Smith; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 4.799