PURPOSE: To evaluate Stargardt disease (STGD) progression and relative lipofuscin levels via autofluorescence image analysis. METHODS: The relationship between focally increased autofluorescence (FIAF), geographic atrophy (GA) and focally decreased autofluorescence (FDAF) was analyzed in serial, registered autofluorescence (AF) scans of 10 patients with STGD (20 eyes, 40 scans; mean follow-up, 2.0 years) using automated techniques. RESULTS: GA progressed uniformly in a transition zone with minimal FIAF. Only 4.3% of FIAF progressed to GA or FDAF, despite significant progression of GA (median 30%/year) and FDAF (mean, 29%/year). As a spatial predictor, the mean chance of FIAF for progression to FDAF was 4.3% +/- 4.4%, significantly less than that of random areas (6.7% +/- 4.0%, P = 0.029, Mann-Whitney test). In the seven eyes with GA, the mean chance of FIAF in the transition zone for transition to GA was 12% +/- 8.9%, significantly less than that of random areas (33% +/- 3.6%, P = 0.026, Mann-Whitney test). CONCLUSIONS: Autofluorescent flecks and FIAF deposits with AF levels elevated above the initial macular background were less likely in the short term (2 years) to transform to GA and FDAF (AF levels below the final background) than random areas, suggesting additional mechanisms beyond direct lipofuscin toxicity. FIAF/FDAF levels were observed to fluctuate, with focal remodeling of FIAF and FDAF, or rarely, even transition of FDAF to FIAF. FDAF tended to develop, not coincident with, but adjacent to initial FIAF. Because AF identifies these characteristic biological markers so specifically, autofluorescence metrics merit consideration in the study of STGD.
PURPOSE: To evaluate Stargardt disease (STGD) progression and relative lipofuscin levels via autofluorescence image analysis. METHODS: The relationship between focally increased autofluorescence (FIAF), geographic atrophy (GA) and focally decreased autofluorescence (FDAF) was analyzed in serial, registered autofluorescence (AF) scans of 10 patients with STGD (20 eyes, 40 scans; mean follow-up, 2.0 years) using automated techniques. RESULTS: GA progressed uniformly in a transition zone with minimal FIAF. Only 4.3% of FIAF progressed to GA or FDAF, despite significant progression of GA (median 30%/year) and FDAF (mean, 29%/year). As a spatial predictor, the mean chance of FIAF for progression to FDAF was 4.3% +/- 4.4%, significantly less than that of random areas (6.7% +/- 4.0%, P = 0.029, Mann-Whitney test). In the seven eyes with GA, the mean chance of FIAF in the transition zone for transition to GA was 12% +/- 8.9%, significantly less than that of random areas (33% +/- 3.6%, P = 0.026, Mann-Whitney test). CONCLUSIONS: Autofluorescent flecks and FIAF deposits with AF levels elevated above the initial macular background were less likely in the short term (2 years) to transform to GA and FDAF (AF levels below the final background) than random areas, suggesting additional mechanisms beyond direct lipofuscintoxicity. FIAF/FDAF levels were observed to fluctuate, with focal remodeling of FIAF and FDAF, or rarely, even transition of FDAF to FIAF. FDAF tended to develop, not coincident with, but adjacent to initial FIAF. Because AF identifies these characteristic biological markers so specifically, autofluorescence metrics merit consideration in the study of STGD.
Authors: Jilin Zhou; Bolin Cai; Young P Jang; Sophia Pachydaki; Ann Marie Schmidt; Janet R Sparrow Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: R Theodore Smith; Jackie K Chan; Mihai Busuoic; Vasuki Sivagnanavel; Alan C Bird; N Victor Chong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: F G Holz; F Schütt; J Kopitz; G E Eldred; F E Kruse; H E Völcker; M Cantz Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tomas R Burke; Gerald A Fishman; Jana Zernant; Carl Schubert; Stephen H Tsang; R Theodore Smith; Radha Ayyagari; Robert K Koenekoop; Allison Umfress; Maria Laura Ciccarelli; Alfonso Baldi; Alessandro Iannaccone; Frans P M Cremers; Caroline C W Klaver; Rando Allikmets Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Emma C Zanzottera; Jeffrey D Messinger; Thomas Ach; R Theodore Smith; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Tomas R Burke; Suzanne Yzer; Jana Zernant; R Theodore Smith; Stephen H Tsang; Rando Allikmets Journal: Ophthalmic Genet Date: 2012-08-07 Impact factor: 1.803