Literature DB >> 10777018

The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: outpatient outcome measures.

B Prieve1, L Dalzell, A Berg, M Bradley, A Cacace, D Campbell, J DeCristofaro, J Gravel, E Greenberg, S Gross, M Orlando, J Pinheiro, J Regan, L Spivak, F Stevens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate outpatient outcome measures of a multi-center, state-wide, universal newborn hearing screening project.
DESIGN: Eight hospitals participated in a 3-yr, funded project. Each hospital designed its own protocol using common criteria for judging whether an infant passed a hearing screening. Infants were tested in the hospital, and those either failing the in-hospital screening or who were not tested in the hospital (missed) were asked to return 4 to 6 wk after hospital discharge for outpatient rescreening. Those infants failing the outpatient rescreening were referred for diagnostic auditory brain stem response testing. Each hospital used its own audiological equipment and criteria to determine whether a particular infant had a hearing loss. All data were collected and analyzed for individual hospitals, as well as totaled across all hospitals. Data were analyzed in terms of year of program operation, nursery type, and geographic region.
RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of infants who failed the in-hospital screening returned for outpatient testing. The percentage of in-hospital fails returning for retesting was significantly higher than the percentage of in-hospital misses returning for retesting. The percentage of infants returning for retesting increased with successive years of program operation. Some differences were noted in the percentage of infants returning for retesting among hospitals and geographic regions of the state. Some differences in outpatient outcome measures also were noted between infants originally born into the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the well-baby nursery (WBN). The percentage of infants from the NICU who returned for retesting was slightly higher than that for infants from the WBN. The percentage of infants from the WBN passing the outpatient rescreening was higher than that for the NICU infants. The overall prevalence of hearing loss was 1.96/1000, with that in the NICU being 8/1000 and that in the WBN being 0.9/1000. Positive predictive value for permanent hearing loss based on inpatient screening was approximately 4% and based on outpatient rescreening was approximately 22%.
CONCLUSIONS: Several outpatient outcome measures changed with successive years of program operation, suggesting that programs improve over time. Also, some outpatient outcome measures differ between NICU and WBN populations. The differences noted across regions of the state in the percentage of infants returning for outpatient retesting require further research to determine whether differences are due to demographic and/or procedural differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10777018     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200004000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  11 in total

1.  Quality of life in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sarah A Borton; Elizabeth Mauze; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Strategies for Educating Physicians about Newborn Hearing Screening.

Authors:  Mary Pat Moeller; Leisha Eiten; Karl White; Lenore Shisler
Journal:  J Acad Rehabil Audiol       Date:  2006-01-01

3.  Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; M Patrick Feeney; Judi A Lapsley Miller; Patricia S Jeng; Susie Bohning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Transitory evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) and distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) outcomes from a three-stage newborn hearing screening protocol.

Authors:  M G Tzanakakis; T S Chimona; E Apazidou; C Giannakopoulou; G A Velegrakis; C E Papadakis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Role of the "rooming-in" on efficacy of universal neonatal hearing screening programmes.

Authors:  D L Grasso; S Hatzopulos; P Cossu; F Ciarafoni; M Rossi; A Martini; E Zocconi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 6.  Hearing loss in children with very low birth weight: current review of epidemiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  R Cristobal; J S Oghalai
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Factors influencing follow-up to newborn hearing screening for infants who are hard of hearing.

Authors:  Lenore Holte; Elizabeth Walker; Jacob Oleson; Meredith Spratford; Mary Pat Moeller; Patricia Roush; Hua Ou; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Prevalence and Social Risk Factors for Hearing Impairment in Chinese Children-A National Survey.

Authors:  Chunfeng Yun; Zhenjie Wang; Jiamin Gao; Ping He; Chao Guo; Gong Chen; Xiaoying Zheng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Newborn Hearing Screening Benefits Children, but Global Disparities Persist.

Authors:  Katrin Neumann; Philipp Mathmann; Shelly Chadha; Harald A Euler; Karl R White
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Molecular Etiology of Hereditary Single-Side Deafness: Its Association With Pigmentary Disorders and Waardenburg Syndrome.

Authors:  Shin Hye Kim; Ah Reum Kim; Hyun Seok Choi; Min Young Kim; Eun Hi Chun; Seung-Ha Oh; Byung Yoon Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.