Literature DB >> 20516221

Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests.

Lisa K Fazio1, Pooja K Agarwal, Elizabeth J Marsh, Henry L Roediger.   

Abstract

Multiple-choice testing has both positive and negative consequences for performance on later tests. Prior testing increases the number of questions answered correctly on a later test but also increases the likelihood that questions will be answered with lures from the previous multiple-choice test (Roediger & Marsh, 2005). Prior research has shown that the positive effects of testing persist over a delay, but no one has examined the durability of the negative effects of testing. To address this, subjects took multiple-choice and cued recall tests (on subsets of questions) both immediately and a week after studying. Although delay reduced both the positive and negative testing effects, both still occurred after 1 week, especially if the multiple-choice test had also been delayed. These results are consistent with the argument that recollection underlies both the positive and negative testing effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20516221      PMCID: PMC4094137          DOI: 10.3758/MC.38.4.407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  10 in total

1.  The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

3.  Nonconscious priming after 17 years: invulnerable implicit memory?

Authors:  David B Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-11

4.  The testing effect in recognition memory: a dual process account.

Authors:  Jason C K Chan; Kathleen B McDermott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Henry L Roediger; Robert A Bjork; Elizabeth L Bjork
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

6.  Evoking false beliefs about autobiographical experience.

Authors:  Alan S Brown; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

7.  Memorial consequences of answering SAT II questions.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Pooja K Agarwal; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-03

8.  Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.

Authors:  Sarah J Barber; Suparna Rajaram; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2008-11

9.  Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04

10.  The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Perception of Learning Versus Performance as Outcome Measures of Educational Research.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Edward Lee; Lauren S Schlesselman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Using Testing as a Learning Tool.

Authors:  Brenda W Yang; Juan Razo; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Lisa K Fazio; Anna E Goswick
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-08-15

4.  Memory for child sexual abuse information: simulated memory error and individual differences.

Authors:  Kelly McWilliams; Gail S Goodman; Kristen E Lyons; Jeremy Newton; Elizabeth Avila-Mora
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-01

5.  Feigning Amnesia Moderately Impairs Memory for a Mock Crime Video.

Authors:  Ivan Mangiulli; Kim van Oorsouw; Antonietta Curci; Harald Merckelbach; Marko Jelicic
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.