Literature DB >> 16812759

Independence of reinforcement delay and magnitude in concurrent chains.

R C Grace.   

Abstract

A three-component concurrent-chains procedure was used to investigate preference between terminal-link schedules that differed in delay and magnitude of reinforcement. Response and time allocation data were well described by a generalized matching model. Sensitivity to delay appeared to be lower when reinforcement magnitudes were unequal than when they were equal, but when obtained rather than programmed time spent responding in the initial links was used in the model, the difference vanished. The results support independence of delay and magnitude as separate dimensions of reinforcement value, as required by the matching law, and the assumption of the contextual choice model (Grace, 1994) that sensitivities to delay and magnitude are affected similarly by temporal context. Although there was statistical evidence for interaction between successive components, the effects were small and transient. The multiple-component concurrent-chains procedure should prove useful in future research on multidimensional preference, although it may be necessary to control obtained initial-link time more precisely.

Year:  1995        PMID: 16812759      PMCID: PMC1334445          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  27 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice as time allocation.

Authors:  W M Baum; H C Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The matching law.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  16 in total

1.  Preference and resistance to change with constant- and variable-duration terminal links: independence of reinforcement rate and magnitude.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Melissa A Bedell; John A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Determinants of pigeons' choices in token-based self-control procedures.

Authors:  Timothy D Hackenberg; Manish Vaidya
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Temporal context in concurrent chains: I. Terminal-link duration.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Toward an operant model of power in organizations.

Authors:  Sonia M Goltz
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2003

5.  Some effects of procedural variations on choice responding in concurrent chains.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.

Authors:  Stephanie T Stilling; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Independence of terminal-link entry rate and immediacy in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Mark E Berg; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Orn Bragason
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Rapid acquisition in concurrent chains: evidence for a decision model.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace; Anthony P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains when alternatives differ on multiple dimensions of reinforcement.

Authors:  Elizabeth G E Kyonka; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.