Literature DB >> 20513332

Assessment of the mixing efficiency of neutral protamine Hagedorn cartridges.

Pia Kaiser1, Sebastian Maxeiner, Alexander Weise, Florain Nolden, Anja Borck, Thomas Forst, Andreas Pfützner.   

Abstract

Reliable application of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin requires previous resuspension of the suspension by tipping over the cartridge 20 times. This procedure is considered annoying by patients. The goal of this investigation was to assess the efficiency of the mixing procedure when performed less frequently than recommended. Neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin cartridges from five different manufacturers (sanofi-aventis, Lilly, Berlin-Chemie, B. Braun, and Novo Nordisk) were emptied with doses of 28 IU in the morning and the evening over 5 days. While the first dose was obtained after a regular resuspension procedure (20x tipping over), the consecutive doses were obtained after 3, 6, 10, or 20 mixing procedures (12 cartridges per experimental series, two doses/day). Insulin concentrations of doses 1, 2, 6, and 10 were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Between dosing, cartridges were stored at room temperature in a horizontal position. Comparable insulin concentrations were seen in the first correctly prepared doses. Pronounced and substantial deviations from the selected dose were observed with most of the cartridges, in particular when resuspending only 3 and 6 times. Mean absolute percentage deviations when tipping 3 times and maximally observed overdoses were: Insuman basal: 1.1 +/- 1.0%/4 IU, Humulin N: 2.6 +/- 3.4%/19 IU, Berlinsulin H basal: 4.4 +/- 6.0%/26 IU, Insulin B. Braun basal: 10.4 +/- 8.9%/38 IU, and Protaphane: 4.7 +/- 4.1%/19 IU (all p < 0.05 vs Insuman basal). Only one cartridge with three metal mixing bullets (sanofi-aventis) was resuspended efficiently with only a few mixing procedures. All other cartridges with fewer bullets were shown to deliver potentially harmful doses if used for treatment when the mixing procedure was less frequent than demanded in the instructions for use. (c) 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513332      PMCID: PMC2901043          DOI: 10.1177/193229681000400320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

1.  Neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin.

Authors:  E Laubach; P Schwandt; M M Ritter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Time-action profile of the soluble, fatty acid acylated, long-acting insulin analogue NN304.

Authors:  L Heinemann; K Sinha; C Weyer; M Loftager; S Hirschberger; T Heise
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  NPH insulin administration by means of a pen injector.

Authors:  J O Jørgensen; A Flyvbjerg; J T Jørgensen; H H Sørensen; B R Johansen; J S Christiansen
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Inadequate suspension of neutral protamine Hagendorn (NPH) insulin in pens.

Authors:  P M Jehle; C Micheler; D R Jehle; D Breitig; B O Boehm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-06       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic variability: assessment of insulin glargine, NPH insulin and insulin ultralente in healthy volunteers using a euglycaemic clamp technique.

Authors:  H E Scholtz; S G Pretorius; D H Wessels; R H A Becker
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 6.  Variability of insulin absorption and insulin action.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Different absorption of isophane (NPH) insulin from subcutaneous and intramuscular sites suggests a need to reassess recommended insulin injection technique.

Authors:  J C Thow; A B Johnson; G Fulcher; P D Home
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.359

8.  Differences in the dose accuracy of insulin pens.

Authors:  Heike Hänel; Alexander Weise; Wei Sun; Johannes W Pfützner; Nicole Thomé; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

9.  Treatment of insulin-dependent diabetes using an injection pen: control, problems and patient preferences.

Authors:  R A Fisken; J Goulbourn
Journal:  Diabetes Res       Date:  1989-08

10.  An assessment of the adequacy of suspension of insulin in pen injectors.

Authors:  A Brown; J M Steel; C Duncan; A Duncan; A M McBain
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.359

View more
  6 in total

1.  An analysis of the mixing efficiency of neutral protamine Hagedorn cartridges.

Authors:  Scott V Monte; Patrick Comerford; Natalie Dearing
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

2.  Improved insulin injection technique, treatment satisfaction and glycemic control: Results from a large cohort education study.

Authors:  Malgorzata Gorska-Ciebiada; Malgorzata Masierek; Maciej Ciebiada
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2020-02-04

3.  Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart Versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from a Danish Health-Care Perspective.

Authors:  Marc Evans; Jens Gundgaard; Brian Bekker Hansen
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.945

4.  Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Mathew John; A G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Sujoy Ghosh; Debmalya Sanyal; Laurence J Hirsch; Vandita Gupta; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire: results of an international study comparing Brazil, Latin America and World data.

Authors:  Luis Eduardo Calliari; Laura Cudizio; Balduino Tschiedel; Hermelinda C Pedrosa; Rosangela Rea; Augusto Pimazoni-Netto; Laurence Hirsch; Kenneth Strauss
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.320

Review 6.  Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India: The Indian Recommendations for Best Practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2017.

Authors:  Nikhil Tandon; Sanjay Kalra; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara; Manash P Baruah; Manoj Chadha; Hemraj B Chandalia; K M Prasanna Kumar; S V Madhu; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Rishi Shukla; Annamalai Sundaram; Ambika G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Vandita Gupta; Subhankar Chowdhury; Jothydev Kesavadev; Subhash K Wangnoo
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.