Literature DB >> 19885213

Differences in the dose accuracy of insulin pens.

Heike Hänel1, Alexander Weise, Wei Sun, Johannes W Pfützner, Nicole Thomé, Andreas Pfützner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modern insulin injection pens provide a convenient and accurate way for diabetes patients to inject insulin. They have widespread use among children and adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the U.S. and Europe. This study compared the dosing accuracy of four commonly available insulin pens (OptiClik and SoloSTAR from sanofi-aventis, FlexPen from Novo Nordisk, and HumaPen LUXURA from Eli Lilly).
METHODS: The dosing accuracy was tested for all pens with 24 x 10 IU and 9 x 30 IU injection volumes to investigate whether the pens complied with the acceptable International Organization for Standardization (ISO) limits of 10% (+/- 1 IU) for 10 IU and 5% (+/- 1.5 IU) for 30 IU. The doses were each applied with a new needle strictly according to the instructions for use by the pen manufacturers. A pharmaceutical balance was used for the assessment of the applied volumes, and the results were corrected for the specific density of the insulin formulations. Four insulin pens (two each from different production lots) were used for each of the two volumes, resulting in a total of 192 doses per pen with 10 IU, and 72 doses per pen with 30 IU.
RESULTS: FlexPen (mean absolute percent deviation for 10 IU and 30 IU: 1.64 +/- 0.84% and 0.83 +/- 0.26%, respectively) and HumaPen LUXURA (1.10 +/- 0.20% and 0.62 +/- 0.19%; not significant versus FlexPen for both doses) were more accurate than the OptiClik (4.78 +/- 3.31% and 2.97 +/- 2.48%, p <.01) and the SoloSTAR (2.61 +/- 0.92% and 1.70 +/- 0.84%, p <.05). While 6.8% of doses were outside the ISO limit at 10 IU with OptiClik (13.9% at 30 IU), the corresponding figures were 0.5% and 4.1%, respectively, for SoloSTAR. No doses outside the ISO limits were seen with FlexPen or HumaPen LUXURA at 10 IU and only one 30 IU dose (1.4%) was outside the limit for FlexPen.
CONCLUSIONS: A direct head-to-head comparison of four insulin pens with a standardized protocol resulted in a more stable dosing accuracy of the FlexPen and the HumaPen LUXURA in comparison to the OptiClik and SoloSTAR. Even though all insulin delivery systems undergo rigorous testing before being approved for sale, there may be reasons to be attentive to the performance of the devices in practical use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; disposable pen; dose delivery; insulin; reusable pen

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885213      PMCID: PMC2769742          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  11 in total

1.  Insulin-pen treatment, quality of life and metabolic control: retrospective intra-group evaluations.

Authors:  J O Hörnquist; A Wikby; P O Andersson; A M Dufva
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.602

2.  Compliance and administration methods in management of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Fortunato Lombardo; G Salzano; Maria Francesca Messina; Filippo De Luca
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Insulin delivery using pen devices. Simple-to-use tools may help young and old alike.

Authors:  N J Bohannon
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Patient and physician satisfaction with the Humulin/Humalog Pen, a new 3.0-mL prefilled pen device for insulin delivery.

Authors:  N J Bohannon; J P Ohannesian; A L Burdan; J H Holcombe; A Zagar
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Preference for insulin delivery systems among current insulin users and nonusers.

Authors:  Kent H Summers; Sheryl L Szeinbach; Sheila M Lenox
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 6.  A review of 20 years' experience with the NovoPen family of insulin injection devices.

Authors:  Jørn Rex; Klaus H Jensen; Simon A Lawton
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.859

7.  Variability of the metabolic effect of soluble insulin and the rapid-acting insulin analog insulin aspart.

Authors:  L Heinemann; C Weyer; M Rauhaus; S Heinrichs; T Heise
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  FlexPen: addressing issues of confidence and convenience in insulin delivery.

Authors:  Mary Korytkowski; Leo Niskanen; Toshinari Asakura
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  A multiple injection regimen using an insulin injection pen and pre-filled cartridged soluble human insulin in adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  I G Jefferson; T M Marteau; M A Smith; J D Baum
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mary Korytkowski; David Bell; Carol Jacobsen; Rudee Suwannasari
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.393

View more
  16 in total

1.  FlexTouch: a prefilled insulin pen with a novel injection mechanism with consistent high accuracy at low- (1 U), medium- (40 U), and high- (80 U) dose settings.

Authors:  Jakob Oest Wielandt; Marcus Niemeyer; Marianne Rye Hansen; Ditlef Bucher; Niels Bjerrum Thomsen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  Study on the dosing accuracy of commonly used disposable insulin pens.

Authors:  Meike Krzywon; Thomas van der Burg; Uwe Fuhr; Manfred Schubert-Zsilavecz; Mona Abdel-Tawab
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Analysis of studies that compare the dose accuracy of prefilled insulin pens.

Authors:  Daniel Crowe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

4.  Comparison of the dose accuracy of prefilled insulin pens.

Authors:  Alexander Weise; Johannes W Pfützner; Julia Borig; Anna M Pfützner; Michael Safinowski; Heike Hänel; Petra B Musholt; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

Review 5.  Boluses in Insulin Therapy.

Authors:  Ralph Ziegler; Guido Freckmann; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-07-10

6.  Dose accuracy and injection force of different insulin glargine pens.

Authors:  Arnd Friedrichs; Janine Bohnet; Volker Korger; Steffen Adler; Manfred Schubert-Zsilavecz; Mona Abdel-Tawab
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

7.  Analysis of insulin pen devices for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jerome E Thurman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

Review 8.  Half-Unit Insulin Pens: Disease Management in Patients With Diabetes Who Are Sensitive to Insulin.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Irina Nayberg; Udo Stauder; Hamid Oualali; Catherine Domenger
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-28

9.  Novopen Echo® for the delivery of insulin: a comparison of usability, functionality and preference among pediatric subjects, their parents, and health care professionals.

Authors:  Birthe S Olsen; Søren Kruse Lilleøre; Conny Nøhr Korsholm; Thorben Kracht
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

10.  Comparison of intuitiveness, ease of use, and preference in two insulin pens.

Authors:  Toshinari Asakura; Klaus H Jensen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.