Literature DB >> 15154947

An assessment of the adequacy of suspension of insulin in pen injectors.

A Brown1, J M Steel, C Duncan, A Duncan, A M McBain.   

Abstract

AIMS: To evaluate the completeness of insulin resuspension by users of neutral Hagedorn (NPH) insulin pens and premixed insulin pens and to relate this to how patients mix insulin before injecting.
METHODS: Patients (n = 180) administering a medium duration or premixed insulin in cartridges in disposable pens were asked questions about mixing insulin, injection technique and storing insulin. They were also asked to demonstrate how they mixed their insulin and to send in a half-used pen. The cloudy component equates to the complexed insulin, while the clear component is the diluting fluid or soluble insulin, depending on the type of insulin used. The optical density, a simple way of measuring cloudiness, was measured in each cartridge or disposable pen and was compared with the range obtained from a series of unused control pens. The results for 146 pens containing the most commonly used insulin were included. The 21 patients whose residual pen insulins showed optical densities > 5 SD from the mean were re-interviewed and their medical records were examined in detail. Insulin in the pens was also measured by immunoassay to confirm the utility of optical density measurements.
RESULTS: Only one patient mixed the insulin as the manufacturers recommended. In 58 out of 146 pens or cartridges (40%) the opacity of the insulin varied significantly from the expected value.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients in Kirkcaldy do not mix insulin adequately. This may result in their giving different incorrect doses of insulin during the use of each pen. More emphasis should be given to teaching patients to mix correctly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15154947     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01206.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of the mixing efficiency of neutral protamine Hagedorn cartridges.

Authors:  Pia Kaiser; Sebastian Maxeiner; Alexander Weise; Florain Nolden; Anja Borck; Thomas Forst; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

2.  Improved insulin injection technique, treatment satisfaction and glycemic control: Results from a large cohort education study.

Authors:  Malgorzata Gorska-Ciebiada; Malgorzata Masierek; Maciej Ciebiada
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2020-02-04

Review 3.  A composite screening tool for medication reviews of outpatients: general issues with specific examples.

Authors:  Peter A G M De Smet; Wilma Denneboom; Cees Kramers; Richard Grol
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart Versus Biphasic Insulin Aspart in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes from a Danish Health-Care Perspective.

Authors:  Marc Evans; Jens Gundgaard; Brian Bekker Hansen
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.945

5.  Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Mathew John; A G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Sujoy Ghosh; Debmalya Sanyal; Laurence J Hirsch; Vandita Gupta; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Evaluation of a Premixed Insulin Analog Suspension in Japanese People with Type 2 Diabetes and the Clinical Importance of Improved Injection Techniques: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kunihiro Suzuki; Chie Aoki; Kanako Kato; Masanori Shimizu; Shintaro Sakurai; Kazunori Yanagi; Hisamoto Kuroda; Yoshimasa Aso
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.945

7.  Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire: results of an international study comparing Brazil, Latin America and World data.

Authors:  Luis Eduardo Calliari; Laura Cudizio; Balduino Tschiedel; Hermelinda C Pedrosa; Rosangela Rea; Augusto Pimazoni-Netto; Laurence Hirsch; Kenneth Strauss
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.320

Review 8.  Forum for Injection Technique and Therapy Expert Recommendations, India: The Indian Recommendations for Best Practice in Insulin Injection Technique, 2017.

Authors:  Nikhil Tandon; Sanjay Kalra; Yatan Pal Singh Balhara; Manash P Baruah; Manoj Chadha; Hemraj B Chandalia; K M Prasanna Kumar; S V Madhu; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Rishi Shukla; Annamalai Sundaram; Ambika G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Vandita Gupta; Subhankar Chowdhury; Jothydev Kesavadev; Subhash K Wangnoo
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

Review 9.  Individual factors increasing complexity of drug treatment-a narrative review.

Authors:  Steffen J Schmidt; Viktoria S Wurmbach; Anette Lampert; Simone Bernard; Walter E Haefeli; Hanna M Seidling; Petra A Thürmann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Insulin Injection Technique is Associated with Glycemic Variability in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lu Yuan; Fengfei Li; Ting Jing; Bo Ding; Yong Luo; Rui Sun; Xiuping Wang; Hefeng Diao; Xiaofei Su; Lei Ye; Jianhua Ma
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.945

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.