BACKGROUND: The glycemic index (GI) is routinely measured 120 minutes after food intake (GI120). The purpose of this prospective open label study was to assess (1) the dynamics of glycemia over the 210 minutes following food consumption and (2) the evolution of GIs based on 120-, 150-, 180-, and 210-minute glycemic profiles. METHOD: Twenty healthy subjects (mean +/- SE; 21.9 +/- 1.39 years of age; body mass index 23.6 +/- 0.63 kg/m(2); 7 men and 13 women) completed the study. Each subject consumed 10 different foods with known GI120 on three separate occasions at four different times of day according to a defined meal plan over a 9-day period; 32 meals were evaluated. The GIs for intervals of 120, 150, 180 and 210 minutes after food consumption were determined using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to measure glycemia. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to compare the GIs. RESULTS: Glycemia returned to baseline within 120 minutes for honey and tomato soup; within 210 minutes for white bread, choco-rice cookies, fish and potatoes, wafers, and meat ravioli with cheese; and later for dark chocolate, apricot dumplings, and choco-wheat cookies. The extended GIs were higher than the respective GI120s in eight of the foods. CONCLUSIONS: The 120-minute glycemic index fails to fully account for changes in glycemia after ingestion of a mixed meal because glycemia remains above baseline for a longer period. The CGMS is a convenient method to determine the glucose response/GIs over intervals extended up to 210 minutes, which is adequate time for the absorption of most foods. (c) 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.
BACKGROUND: The glycemic index (GI) is routinely measured 120 minutes after food intake (GI120). The purpose of this prospective open label study was to assess (1) the dynamics of glycemia over the 210 minutes following food consumption and (2) the evolution of GIs based on 120-, 150-, 180-, and 210-minute glycemic profiles. METHOD: Twenty healthy subjects (mean +/- SE; 21.9 +/- 1.39 years of age; body mass index 23.6 +/- 0.63 kg/m(2); 7 men and 13 women) completed the study. Each subject consumed 10 different foods with known GI120 on three separate occasions at four different times of day according to a defined meal plan over a 9-day period; 32 meals were evaluated. The GIs for intervals of 120, 150, 180 and 210 minutes after food consumption were determined using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to measure glycemia. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to compare the GIs. RESULTS: Glycemia returned to baseline within 120 minutes for honey and tomato soup; within 210 minutes for white bread, choco-rice cookies, fish and potatoes, wafers, and meat ravioli with cheese; and later for dark chocolate, apricot dumplings, and choco-wheat cookies. The extended GIs were higher than the respective GI120s in eight of the foods. CONCLUSIONS: The 120-minute glycemic index fails to fully account for changes in glycemia after ingestion of a mixed meal because glycemia remains above baseline for a longer period. The CGMS is a convenient method to determine the glucose response/GIs over intervals extended up to 210 minutes, which is adequate time for the absorption of most foods. (c) 2010 Diabetes Technology Society.
Authors: Rudolf Chlup; Pavel Seckar; Jana Zapletalová; Katerina Langová; Pavla Kudlová; Karolina Chlupová; Josef Bartek; Daniela Jelenová Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2008-01
Authors: Rudolf Chlup; Martin Payne; Jana Zapletalová; Stanislav Komenda; Blanka Doubravová; Martina Reznícková; Ludmila Chlupová; Pavel Seckar Journal: Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 1.245
Authors: Petr Mlcák; Jana Fialová; Katerina Trnková; Rudolf Chlup Journal: Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 1.245
Authors: David J A Jenkins; Cyril W C Kendall; Livia S A Augustin; Silvia Franceschi; Maryam Hamidi; Augustine Marchie; Alexandra L Jenkins; Mette Axelsen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Peterson Karolina; Rudolf Chlup; Zapletalova Jana; Klaus Dieter Kohnert; Pavla Kudlova; Josef Bartek; Marie Nakladalova; Blanka Doubravova; Pavel Seckar Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2010-07-01
Authors: Alexandra Rankovic; Jennifer L Adolphe; D Dan Ramdath; Anna K Shoveller; Adronie Verbrugghe Journal: J Anim Sci Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 3.159
Authors: María González-Rodríguez; Marcos Pazos-Couselo; José M García-López; Santiago Rodríguez-Segade; Javier Rodríguez-García; Carmen Túñez-Bastida; Francisco Gude Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 4.169