Literature DB >> 32770217

Glycemic response in nonracing sled dogs fed single starch ingredients and commercial extruded dog foods with different carbohydrate sources.

Alexandra Rankovic1, Jennifer L Adolphe2, D Dan Ramdath3, Anna K Shoveller4, Adronie Verbrugghe1.   

Abstract

This study adapted the established glycemic index (GI) methodology used in human research to perform two studies in sled dogs in order to assess the blood glucose-raising potential of pulse-based dog foods. The first was a pilot study (n = 6 dogs) to determine the GI of single starch sources (white bread, cooked white rice, and cooked green lentils) using a glucose solution as control. Next, the effect on glycemic and insulinemic meal responses and GI of commercial extruded dog foods containing different categories of starch sources (traditional grain, whole grain, grain-free, and vegan) were investigated on 11 dogs using a glucose control. Results were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Consumption of 10 g of available carbohydrate (Av CHO) was insufficient to elicit a measurable response in blood glucose for GI determination, and as such, the amount was increased to 25 g for the second study. The GI (±SE) of the single starch sources and dog foods was: white bread: 47 ± 11, cooked white rice: 71 ± 14, cooked green lentils: 60 ± 20 (P = 0.569), traditional grain: 83 ± 17, whole grain: 56 ± 8, grain-free: 41 ± 6, and vegan: 65 ± 15 (P = 0.154). No statistical differences in glycemic response over time were observed between the single starch sources or the extruded diets tested (P = 0.1412; P = 0.2651). The insulinemic response elicited by the extruded diets was also not different (P = 0.079); however, the traditional grain diet did have the slowest time to peak for insulin (P = 0.0078). Among single starch sources and extruded dog foods, there were no differences in the glycemic indices measured in this study. The GI methodology has not been validated for use in canine species, and it is likely that our results were due to higher interindividual variation or inadequate study power. Regardless, this study will serve to better define future studies to investigate the potential physiological benefits of low GI foods for dogs.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  canine; glycemic index; grain-free; insulin; nutrition; pulses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32770217      PMCID: PMC7455921          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  36 in total

1.  International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002.

Authors:  Kaye Foster-Powell; Susanna H A Holt; Janette C Brand-Miller
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Composition, structure, functionality, and chemical modification of legume starches: a review.

Authors:  R Hoover; F W Sosulski
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.273

3.  Glycaemic index methodology.

Authors:  F Brouns; I Bjorck; K N Frayn; A L Gibbs; V Lang; G Slama; T M S Wolever
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.800

4.  Canned high fiber diet and postprandial glycemia in dogs with naturally occurring diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  P A Graham; I E Maskell; A S Nash
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Effect of an extruded pea or rice diet on postprandial insulin and cardiovascular responses in dogs.

Authors:  J L Adolphe; M D Drew; T I Silver; J Fouhse; H Childs; L P Weber
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.130

6.  Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange.

Authors:  D J Jenkins; T M Wolever; R H Taylor; H Barker; H Fielden; J M Baldwin; A C Bowling; H C Newman; A L Jenkins; D V Goff
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 7.  Natural pet food: a review of natural diets and their impact on canine and feline physiology.

Authors:  P R Buff; R A Carter; J E Bauer; J H Kersey
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Postprandial impairment of flow-mediated dilation and elevated methylglyoxal after simple but not complex carbohydrate consumption in dogs.

Authors:  Jennifer L Adolphe; Murray D Drew; Qian Huang; Tawni I Silver; Lynn P Weber
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Amylase activity is associated with AMY2B copy numbers in dog: implications for dog domestication, diet and diabetes.

Authors:  Maja Arendt; Tove Fall; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Erik Axelsson
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A Kinetic Model of Whole-Body Glucose Metabolism with Reference to the Domestic Dog (Canis lupus familiaris).

Authors:  Leslie L McKnight; Anna K Shoveller; Secundino Lopez; James France
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2015-06-08
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Roles of plant-based ingredients and phytonutrients in canine nutrition and health.

Authors:  Jirayu Tanprasertsuk; Devon E Tate; Justin Shmalberg
Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 2.718

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.