Literature DB >> 24836360

Nonlinear analyses of elicited modal, raised, and pressed rabbit phonation.

Shaheen N Awan1, Carolyn K Novaleski2, Bernard Rousseau3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to use nonlinear dynamic analysis methods such as phase space portraits and correlation dimension (D2) as well as descriptive spectrographic analyses to characterize acoustic signals produced during evoked rabbit phonation.
METHODS: Seventeen New Zealand white breeder rabbits were used to perform the study. A Grass S-88 stimulator (SA Instrumentation, Encinitas, CA) and constant current isolation unit (Grass Telefactor, model PSIU6; West Warwick, RI) were used to provide electrical stimulation to laryngeal musculature, and transglottal airflow rate and stimulation current (mA) were manipulated to elicit modal, raised intensity, and pressed phonations. Central 1 second portions of the most stable portion of the acoustic waveform for modal, raised intensity, and pressed phonations were edited and then analyzed via phase space portraits, Poincaré sections, and the estimation of the D2. In an attempt to limit the effects of the highly variable and nonstationary characteristics of some of the signals being analyzed, D2 analysis was also performed on the most stable central 200-millisecond portion of the acoustic waveform. Descriptive analysis of each phonation was also conducted using sound spectrograms.
RESULTS: Results showed that the complexity of phonation and the subsequent acoustic waveform is increased as transglottal airflow rate and degree of glottal adduction are manipulated in the evoked rabbit phonation model. In particular, phonatory complexity, as quantified via D2 analyses and demonstrated via spectrographic characteristics, increases from "modal" (ie, phonation elicited at just above the phonation threshold pressure) to raised intensity (phonation elicited by increasing transglottal airflow rate) to pressed (phonation elicited by increasing the stimulation current delivered to the larynx). Variations in a single dynamic dimension (airflow rate or adductory force) resulted in significantly increased productions of nonlinear phenomenon, including bifurcations from periodicity to regions of subharmonic content, fundamental frequency, and harmonic jumps, and evidence of periodicity within aperiodic regions ("chaos").
CONCLUSIONS: The evoked rabbit phonation model described in this study allows for the elicitation of various types of phonations under controlled conditions and, therefore, has the potential to provide insight regarding important variables that may elicit examples of nonlinear phenomena such as subharmonics and deterministic chaos.
Copyright © 2014 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bifurcations; Chaos; Nonlinear dynamic analysis; Pressed phonation; Subharmonics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24836360      PMCID: PMC4157117          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  37 in total

1.  Objective methods of sample selection in acoustic analysis of voice.

Authors:  Aleksandra E Olszewski; Lisa Shen; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 2.  Chaos in voice, from modeling to measurement.

Authors:  Jack J Jiang; Yu Zhang; Clancy McGilligan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of adult male smokers.

Authors:  Lingying Chai; Alicia J Sprecher; Yi Zhang; Yufang Liang; Huijun Chen; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 3.140

5.  Speech waveform perturbation analysis: a perceptual-acoustical comparison of seven measures.

Authors:  A G Askenfelt; B Hammarberg
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-03

6.  Ventricular fold vibration in voice production: a high-speed imaging study with kymographic, acoustic and perceptual analyses of a voice patient and a vocally healthy subject.

Authors:  Per-Ake Lindestad; Veronica Blixt; Jenny Pahlberg-Olsson; Britta Hammarberg
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.487

7.  Nonlinear acoustics in pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): frequency jumps, subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Michael J Owren; Adam Clark Arcadi
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.371

8.  The effect of recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model.

Authors:  G S Berke; D M Moore; B R Gerratt; D G Hanson; T S Bell; M Natividad
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Effect of superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model.

Authors:  G S Berke; D M Moore; B R Gerratt; D G Hanson; M Natividad
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  How low can you go? Physical production mechanism of elephant infrasonic vocalizations.

Authors:  Christian T Herbst; Angela S Stoeger; Roland Frey; Jörg Lohscheller; Ingo R Titze; Michaela Gumpenberger; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Applied Chaos Level Test for Validation of Signal Conditions Underlying Optimal Performance of Voice Classification Methods.

Authors:  Boquan Liu; Evan Polce; Julien C Sprott; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Using Rate of Divergence as an Objective Measure to Differentiate between Voice Signal Types Based on the Amount of Disorder in the Signal.

Authors:  William M Calawerts; Liyu Lin; J C Sprott; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Investigation of phonatory characteristics using ex vivo rabbit larynges.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; Stefan Kniesburges; David A Berry; Veronika Birk; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Dürr; Christoph Alexiou; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Nonstimulated rabbit phonation model: Cricothyroid approximation.

Authors:  Carolyn K Novaleski; Tsuyoshi Kojima; Siyuan Chang; Haoxiang Luo; Carla V Valenzuela; Bernard Rousseau
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Evaluating the Voice Type Component Distributions of Excised Larynx Phonations at Three Subglottal Pressures.

Authors:  Boquan Liu; Hayley Raj; Logan Klein; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.