Literature DB >> 18023324

Glottal airflow resistance in excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges.

Fariborz Alipour1, Sanyukta Jaiswal.   

Abstract

This study was to investigate glottal flow resistance in excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges during phonation at different oscillation ranges and to examine the relation of the glottal flow resistance to the laryngeal geometry and vocal fold vibration. Several pig, sheep, and cow larynges were prepared, mounted on an excised larynx bench, and set into oscillation with pressurized, heated, and humidified air. Glottal adduction was controlled by either using two-pronged probes to press the arytenoids together, or by passing a suture to simulate the lateral cricoarytenoid muscle action. Each excised larynx was subjected to a series of pressure-flow experiments, with adduction and flow rate as independent variables. The subglottal pressure, fundamental frequency, and glottal flow resistance were treated as dependent variables. The subglottal pressure, electroglottograph (EGG), and flow rate signals were recorded during each experiment. Glottal flow resistance was calculated from the pressure and flow signals, whereas the EGG signal was used to extract fundamental frequency. Preliminary data indicated a nonlinear behavior in the pressure-flow relations of these larynges with increasing glottal resistance due to increases in adduction. The average glottal flow resistance was 35.3+/-14.8 cmH(2)O/(L/s) for the pig, 30.8+/-17.5 cmH(2)O/(L/s) for the sheep, and 26.9+/-14.9 cmH(2)O/(L/s) for the cow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18023324     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  18 in total

1.  Vocal power and pressure-flow relationships in excised tiger larynges.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; W Tecumseh Fitch; Eric J Hunter; Fariborz Alipour; Douglas Montequin; Douglas L Armstrong; Joann McGee; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Cervids with different vocal behavior demonstrate different viscoelastic properties of their vocal folds.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Susan Lingle; Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.804

3.  Automated setup for ex vivo larynx experiments.

Authors:  Veronika Birk; Michael Döllinger; Alexander Sutor; David A Berry; Dominik Gedeon; Maximilian Traxdorf; Olaf Wendler; Christopher Bohr; Stefan Kniesburges
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Influence of glottal closure on the phonatory process in ex vivo porcine larynges.

Authors:  Veronika Birk; Stefan Kniesburges; Marion Semmler; David A Berry; Christopher Bohr; Michael Döllinger; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustic characteristics of phonation in "wet voice" conditions.

Authors:  Shanmugam Murugappan; Suzanne Boyce; Sid Khosla; Lisa Kelchner; Ephraim Gutmark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Determination of strain field on the superior surface of excised larynx vocal folds using DIC.

Authors:  Hani Bakhshaee; Jonathan Young; Justin C W Yang; Luc Mongeau; Amir K Miri
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 7.  Characterization of vocal fold scar formation, prophylaxis, and treatment using animal models.

Authors:  Diane M Bless; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Interspecies comparison of mucosal wave properties using high-speed digital imaging.

Authors:  Michael F Regner; Mark J Robitaille; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Investigation of phonatory characteristics using ex vivo rabbit larynges.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; Stefan Kniesburges; David A Berry; Veronika Birk; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Dürr; Christoph Alexiou; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  A rat excised larynx model of vocal fold scar.

Authors:  Nathan V Welham; Douglas W Montequin; Ichiro Tateya; Tomoko Tateya; Seong Hee Choi; Diane M Bless
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.