Literature DB >> 20512796

Jostling for position: optimizing linker location in the design of estrogen receptor-targeting PROTACs.

Kedra Cyrus1, Marie Wehenkel, Eun-Young Choi, Hyosung Lee, Hollie Swanson, Kyung-Bo Kim.   

Abstract

Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER) antagonists have been widely used for breast cancer therapy. Despite initial responsiveness, hormone-sensitive ER-positive cancer cells eventually develop resistance to ER antagonists. It has been shown that in most of these resistant tumor cells, the ER is expressed and continues to regulate tumor growth. Recent studies indicate that tamoxifen initially acts as an antagonist, but later functions as an ER agonist, promoting tumor growth. This suggests that targeted ER degradation may provide an effective therapeutic approach for breast cancers, even those that are resistant to conventional therapies. With this in mind, we previously demonstrated that proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) effectively induce degradation of the ER as a proof-of-concept experiment. Herein we further refined the PROTAC approach to target the ER for degradation. The ER-targeting PROTACs are composed of an estradiol on one end and a hypoxia-inducing factor 1alpha (HIF-1alpha)-derived synthetic pentapeptide on the other. The pentapeptide is recognized by an E3 ubiquitin ligase called the von Hippel Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL), thereby recruiting the ER to this E3 ligase for ubiquitination and degradation. Specifically, the pentapeptide is attached at three different locations on estradiol to generate three different PROTAC types. With the pentapeptide linked through the C7alpha position of estradiol, the resulting PROTAC shows the most effective ER degradation and highest affinity for the estrogen receptor. This result provides an opportunity to develop a novel type of ER antagonist that may overcome the resistance of breast tumors to conventional drugs such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant (Faslodex).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20512796      PMCID: PMC3516907          DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201000146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ChemMedChem        ISSN: 1860-7179            Impact factor:   3.466


  49 in total

Review 1.  Similarities and distinctions in the mode of action of different classes of antioestrogens.

Authors:  A E Wakeling
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.678

Review 2.  Selective estrogen receptor modulation: concept and consequences in cancer.

Authors:  V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  Development of novel oestrogen-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  A E Wakeling; J Bowler
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.407

4.  Targeting steroid hormone receptors for ubiquitination and degradation in breast and prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Rodriguez-Gonzalez; K Cyrus; M Salcius; K Kim; C M Crews; R J Deshaies; K M Sakamoto
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  Integrated "3+1" oxorhenium(V) complexes as estrogen mimics.

Authors:  M B Skaddan; J A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.774

6.  Synthesis and evaluation of geldanamycin-estradiol hybrids.

Authors:  S D Kuduk; F F Zheng; L Sepp-Lorenzino; N Rosen; S J Danishefsky
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  1999-05-03       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Methotrexate inhibits proteolysis of dihydrofolate reductase by the N-end rule pathway.

Authors:  J A Johnston; E S Johnson; P R Waller; A Varshavsky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Antiestrogen resistance in breast cancer and the role of estrogen receptor signaling.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; Minetta C Liu; Kerrie B Bouker; Zhiping Gu; Richard Y Lee; Yuelin Zhu; Todd C Skaar; Bianca Gomez; Kerry O'Brien; Yue Wang; Leena A Hilakivi-Clarke
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Measurement of steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer patients on tamoxifen.

Authors:  C A Encarnación; D R Ciocca; W L McGuire; G M Clark; S A Fuqua; C K Osborne
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Chemical genetic control of protein levels: selective in vivo targeted degradation.

Authors:  John S Schneekloth; Fabiana N Fonseca; Michael Koldobskiy; Amit Mandal; Raymond Deshaies; Kathleen Sakamoto; Craig M Crews
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  24 in total

1.  Design, synthesis, and initial biological evaluation of a steroidal anti-estrogen-doxorubicin bioconjugate for targeting estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Kinh-Luan Dao; Rupa R Sawant; J Adam Hendricks; Victoria Ronga; Vladimir P Torchilin; Robert N Hanson
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 2.  Targeted protein knockdown using small molecule degraders.

Authors:  Kanak Raina; Craig M Crews
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 3.  Targeted Protein Degradation: from Chemical Biology to Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Philipp M Cromm; Craig M Crews
Journal:  Cell Chem Biol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 8.116

4.  PROTAC-induced proteolytic targeting.

Authors:  Kimberly Cornish Carmony; Kyung-Bo Kim
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Unifying principles of bifunctional, proximity-inducing small molecules.

Authors:  Christopher J Gerry; Stuart L Schreiber
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 15.040

6.  Scaffold hopping enables direct access to more potent PROTACs with in vivo activity.

Authors:  George M Burslem; Daniel P Bondeson; Craig M Crews
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors equipped with estrogen receptor modulation activity.

Authors:  Berkley E Gryder; Michael K Rood; Kenyetta A Johnson; Vishal Patil; Eric D Raftery; Li-Pan D Yao; Marcie Rice; Bahareh Azizi; Donald F Doyle; Adegboyega K Oyelere
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 7.446

8.  Rationalizing PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Formation Using Rosetta.

Authors:  Nan Bai; Sven A Miller; Grigorii V Andrianov; Max Yates; Palani Kirubakaran; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  AZD5438-PROTAC: A selective CDK2 degrader that protects against cisplatin- and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Santanu Hati; Marisa Zallocchi; Robert Hazlitt; Yuju Li; Sarath Vijayakumar; Jaeki Min; Zoran Rankovic; Sándor Lovas; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 10.  The emerging role for Cullin 4 family of E3 ligases in tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Jianping Guo; Brian J North; Kaixiong Tao; Pengbo Zhou; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 10.680

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.