Literature DB >> 15378543

Lay people's understanding of and preference against the word "mutation".

Celeste M Condit1, Tasha Dubriwny, John Lynch, Roxanne Parrott.   

Abstract

Lay understandings of the term "mutation" are explored using three methodologies and three population bases. A community based sample (n = 848) employing a written survey to assess knowledge and understanding indicated good lay understanding of the basic concept of mutation. However, lay people associated mutation with reproductive outcomes, but not with changes in genes across the life span. A student sample (n = 241) employed a written survey to assess connotations of the term mutation. It showed a strong negative response to mutation. A community based sample (n = 120) employing focus groups also showed strong negative reactions to the term mutation and rejection of use of the term mutation in public service announcements (PSAs). The term variation had better response and is recommended as an alternative in genetic counseling and public media.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15378543     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  14 in total

1.  "SLANG"--Sensitive Language and the New Genetics--an exploratory study.

Authors:  J Hodgson; E Hughes; C Lambert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.

Authors:  Susan Brown Trinidad; Evette J Ludman; Scarlett Hopkins; Rosalina D James; Theresa J Hoeft; Annie Kinegak; Henry Lupie; Ralph Kinegak; Bert B Boyer; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  Striking a balance in communicating pharmacogenetic test results: promoting comprehension and minimizing adverse psychological and behavioral response.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Hayden Bosworth
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-06-21

4.  Depression and genetic causal attribution of epilepsy in multiplex epilepsy families.

Authors:  Shawn T Sorge; Dale C Hesdorffer; Jo C Phelan; Melodie R Winawer; Sara Shostak; Jeff Goldsmith; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 5.864

5.  Development of an Educational Program Integrating Concepts of Genetic Risk and Preventive Strategies for Children with a Family History of Melanoma.

Authors:  Yelena P Wu; Lisa G Aspinwall; Elizabeth Nagelhout; Wendy Kohlmann; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Sheila Homburger; Ryan D Perkins; Douglas Grossman; Garrett Harding; Pamela Cassidy; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Knowledge about genetics among African Americans.

Authors:  Lisa Kessler; Aliya Collier; Chanita Hughes Halbert
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Misunderstandings concerning genetics among patients confronting genetic disease.

Authors:  Robert L Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Perceptions of the concept of mutation among family members of patients receiving outpatient genetic services and university students.

Authors:  Noriko Ando; Yumi Iwamitsu; Kazuhisa Takemura; Yukiko Saito; Fumio Takada
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic attribution and perceived impact of epilepsy in multiplex epilepsy families.

Authors:  Diana C Garofalo; Shawn T Sorge; Dale C Hesdorffer; Melodie R Winawer; Jo C Phelan; Wendy K Chung; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Picking a frame for communicating about genetics: stigmas or challenges.

Authors:  Rachel A Smith
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 2.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.