Literature DB >> 20510538

Role of positron emission tomography in the treatment of occult disease in head-and-neck cancer: a modeling approach.

Mark H Phillips1, Wade P Smith, Upendra Parvathaneni, George E Laramore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine under what conditions positron emission tomography (PET) imaging will be useful in decisions regarding the use of radiotherapy for the treatment of clinically occult lymph node metastases in head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A decision model of PET imaging and its downstream effects on radiotherapy outcomes was constructed using an influence diagram. This model included the sensitivity and specificity of PET, as well as the type and stage of the primary tumor. These parameters were varied to determine the optimal strategy for imaging and therapy for different clinical situations. Maximum expected utility was the metric by which different actions were ranked.
RESULTS: For primary tumors with a low probability of lymph node metastases, the sensitivity of PET should be maximized, and 50 Gy should be delivered if PET is positive and 0 Gy if negative. As the probability for lymph node metastases increases, PET imaging becomes unnecessary in some situations, and the optimal dose to the lymph nodes increases. The model needed to include the causes of certain health states to predict current clinical practice.
CONCLUSION: The model demonstrated the ability to reproduce expected outcomes for a range of tumors and provided recommendations for different clinical situations. The differences between the optimal policies and current clinical practice are likely due to a disparity between stated clinical decision processes and actual decision making by clinicians.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20510538      PMCID: PMC2932845          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.12.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  16 in total

1.  Utilities for prostate cancer health states in men aged 60 and older.

Authors:  Susan T Stewart; Leslie Lenert; Vibha Bhatnagar; Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Patients' utilities for cancer treatments: a study of the chained procedure for the standard gamble and time tradeoff.

Authors:  S J Jansen; A M Stiggelbout; P P Wakker; T P Vliet Vlieland; J W Leer; M A Nooy; J Kievit
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Can FDG-PET assist in radiotherapy target volume definition of metastatic lymph nodes in head-and-neck cancer?

Authors:  Dominic A X Schinagl; Aswin L Hoffmann; Wouter V Vogel; Jorn A van Dalen; Suzan M M Verstappen; Wim J G Oyen; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Is there a need for positron emission tomography imaging to stage the N0 neck in T1-T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx?

Authors:  Ursula Schroeder; Markus Dietlein; Claus Wittekindt; Monika Ortmann; Hartmut Stuetzer; Julia Vent; Markus Jungehuelsing; Barbara Krug
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Defining the risk of involvement for each neck nodal level in patients with early T-stage node-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sanguineti; Joseph Califano; Edward Stafford; Jana Fox; Wayne Koch; Ralph Tufano; Maria Pia Sormani; Arlene Forastiere
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Partial-breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  David J Sher; Eve Wittenberg; W Warren Suh; Alphonse G Taghian; Rinaa S Punglia
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A decision aid for intensity-modulated radiation-therapy plan selection in prostate cancer based on a prognostic Bayesian network and a Markov model.

Authors:  Wade P Smith; Jason Doctor; Jürgen Meyer; Ira J Kalet; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Revisiting the role of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in determining the need for planned neck dissection following chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Christine G Gourin; Brian J Boyce; Hadyn T Williams; Anne V Herdman; Paul A Bilodeau; Teresa A Coleman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  The diagnostic and prognostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based follow-up after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Johnny Kao; Ha Linh Vu; Eric M Genden; Bharat Mocherla; Eunice E Park; Stuart Packer; Peter M Som; Lale Kostakoglu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Freedom from local and regional failure of contralateral neck with ipsilateral neck radiotherapy for node-positive tonsil cancer: results of a prospective management approach.

Authors:  Kyle E Rusthoven; David Raben; Charles Schneider; Robert Witt; Sarah Sammons; Adam Raben
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  6 in total

1.  Development of a Novel Markov Chain Model for the Prediction of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Dissemination.

Authors:  Hyunggu Jung; Anthony Law; Eli Grunblatt; Lucy L Wang; Aaron Kusano; Jose L V Mejino; Mark E Whipple
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  Multicenter Trial of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and Negative Predictive Value and Surgical Impact in the N0 Neck: Results From ACRIN 6685.

Authors:  Val J Lowe; Fenghai Duan; Rathan M Subramaniam; JoRean D Sicks; Justin Romanoff; Twyla Bartel; Jian Q Michael Yu; Brian Nussenbaum; Jeremy Richmon; Charles D Arnold; David Cognetti; Brendan C Stack
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Machine learning and modeling: Data, validation, communication challenges.

Authors:  Issam El Naqa; Dan Ruan; Gilmer Valdes; Andre Dekker; Todd McNutt; Yaorong Ge; Q Jackie Wu; Jung Hun Oh; Maria Thor; Wade Smith; Arvind Rao; Clifton Fuller; Ying Xiao; Frank Manion; Matthew Schipper; Charles Mayo; Jean M Moran; Randall Ten Haken
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Applying Probabilistic Decision Models to Clinical Trial Design.

Authors:  Wade P Smith; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2018-05-18

5.  Decision analytic modeling for the economic analysis of proton radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wade P Smith; Patrick J Richard; Jing Zeng; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Ramesh Rengan; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04

6.  A situational awareness Bayesian network approach for accurate and credible personalized adaptive radiotherapy outcomes prediction in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yi Luo; Shruti Jolly; David Palma; Theodore S Lawrence; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Gilmer Valdes; Daniel McShan; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam Ei Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.119

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.