Literature DB >> 19544537

The diagnostic and prognostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based follow-up after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Johnny Kao1, Ha Linh Vu, Eric M Genden, Bharat Mocherla, Eunice E Park, Stuart Packer, Peter M Som, Lale Kostakoglu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The detection of subclinical head and neck cancer recurrence or a second primary tumor may improve survival. In the current study, the authors investigated the clinical value of a follow-up program incorporating serial (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography integrated with computed tomography (PET/CT) in the detection of recurrent disease in patients with head and neck cancer.
METHODS: A total of 240 PET/CT scans were reviewed in 80 patients with head and neck cancer who were treated with radiotherapy (RT) from July, 2005 through August, 2007. All patients were followed with clinical examination, PET/CT, and correlative imaging for a minimum of 11 months (median follow-up, 21 months).
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PET/CT-based follow-up for detecting locoregional recurrence were 92%, 82%, 42%, and 98%, respectively. Corresponding values for distant metastases or second primary tumors were 93%, 96%, 81%, and 98%, respectively. Eight patients (10%) developed disease recurrences or second primary tumors that were amenable to salvage surgery with negative surgical margins. The 2-year progression-free survival and 2-year overall survival rates were significantly different between patients who had a negative and those with a positive PET/CT result within 6 months of the completion of RT (93% vs 30% [P<.001] and 100% vs 32% [P<.001], respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although post-therapy follow-up using PET/CT is reportedly associated with a high false-positive rate in the irradiated head and neck, PET/CT appears to be a highly sensitive technique for the detection of recurrent disease. Furthermore, negative PET/CT results within 6 months of the completion of RT offer significant prognostic value. 2009 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19544537     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  34 in total

Review 1.  Biologic imaging of head and neck cancer: the present and the future.

Authors:  A Srinivasan; S Mohan; S K Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Present and future role of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of head and neck carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Prognostic value of post-treatment (18)F-FDG PET/CT for advanced head and neck cancer after combined intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kimiteru Ito; Keigo Shimoji; Yoko Miyata; Kouhei Kamiya; Ryogo Minamimoto; Kazuo Kubota; Momoko Okasaki; Miyako Morooka; Jyunkichi Yokoyama
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 4.  Potential Role of PET/MRI for Imaging Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Sungheon Gene Kim; Kent Friedman; Sohil Patel; Mari Hagiwara
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  PET/CT in head and neck cancer: an update.

Authors:  Roland Hustinx; Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Diagnostic performance of post-treatment FDG PET or FDG PET/CT imaging in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tejpal Gupta; Zubin Master; Sadhana Kannan; Jai Prakash Agarwal; Sarbani Ghsoh-Laskar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Vedang Murthy; Ashwini Budrukkar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Doctor, what does my future hold? The prognostic value of FDG-PET in solid tumours.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT as a post-treatment tool in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with FDG-PET/non-contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT.

Authors:  Yuko Suenaga; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takeaki Ishihara; Ryohei Sasaki; Naoki Otsuki; Ken-Ichi Nibu; Tsutomu Minamikawa; Naomi Kiyota; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Superselective neck dissection: rationale, indications, and results.

Authors:  Carlos Suárez; Juan P Rodrigo; K Thomas Robbins; Vinidh Paleri; Carl E Silver; Alessandra Rinaldo; Jesus E Medina; Marc Hamoir; Alvaro Sanabria; Vanni Mondin; Robert P Takes; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  FDG-PET/CT imaging biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Vasavi Paidpally; Alin Chirindel; Stella Lam; Nishant Agrawal; Harry Quon; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.