BACKGROUND: Anaemia is a common complication in dialysis patients. In most cases, it is treated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA). It is not entirely clear whether the variability of haemoglobin caused by changing ESA response is associated with increased mortality. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate ESA responsiveness and haemoglobin variability in association with mortality. METHODS: We used the Austrian dialysis and transplant registry, and identified 932 patients who were on maintenance haemodialysis in the years 2005-08 with recorded weekly ESA doses and haemoglobin concentrations. ESA response was defined as a positive regression slope over the observation period. Cox regression analysis with spline functions and purposeful variable selection algorithms were used. RESULTS: Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed an increased mortality risk in subjects with wide ranges of haemoglobin variability (from <10 to >12 g/dL) (HR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.20-4.71, P = 0.013). Furthermore, patients that never reached haemoglobin levels >10 g/dL despite ESA therapy exhibited the highest risk of mortality (HR = 6.37, 95% CI 2.15-18.82, P < 0.001). ESA hypo-responsiveness was associated with increased risk of mortality in the low as well as high haemoglobin ranges [HR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.49-2.86 at haemoglobin of 9.5 g/dL and HR = 1.64, 95% CI 0.68-3.92 at 13.5 g/dL both vs. 11 g/dL (reference)]. ESA dose equivalents >16,000 units per week were associated with increased mortality in ESA responders (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.64). However, in hypo-responders, mortality is not associated with ESA dose (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.20) [both at weekly ESA dose of 20,000 units vs. 16,000 (reference)]. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the risk of mortality of haemodialysis patients requiring ESA therapy is lowest if the haemoglobin concentration is stably maintained in the range between 10 and 12 g/dL with weekly ESA dose equivalents <16,000 units.
BACKGROUND:Anaemia is a common complication in dialysis patients. In most cases, it is treated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA). It is not entirely clear whether the variability of haemoglobin caused by changing ESA response is associated with increased mortality. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate ESA responsiveness and haemoglobin variability in association with mortality. METHODS: We used the Austrian dialysis and transplant registry, and identified 932 patients who were on maintenance haemodialysis in the years 2005-08 with recorded weekly ESA doses and haemoglobin concentrations. ESA response was defined as a positive regression slope over the observation period. Cox regression analysis with spline functions and purposeful variable selection algorithms were used. RESULTS: Adjusted Cox regression analysis showed an increased mortality risk in subjects with wide ranges of haemoglobin variability (from <10 to >12 g/dL) (HR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.20-4.71, P = 0.013). Furthermore, patients that never reached haemoglobin levels >10 g/dL despite ESA therapy exhibited the highest risk of mortality (HR = 6.37, 95% CI 2.15-18.82, P < 0.001). ESA hypo-responsiveness was associated with increased risk of mortality in the low as well as high haemoglobin ranges [HR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.49-2.86 at haemoglobin of 9.5 g/dL and HR = 1.64, 95% CI 0.68-3.92 at 13.5 g/dL both vs. 11 g/dL (reference)]. ESA dose equivalents >16,000 units per week were associated with increased mortality in ESA responders (HR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.64). However, in hypo-responders, mortality is not associated with ESA dose (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.20) [both at weekly ESA dose of 20,000 units vs. 16,000 (reference)]. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the risk of mortality of haemodialysis patients requiring ESA therapy is lowest if the haemoglobin concentration is stably maintained in the range between 10 and 12 g/dL with weekly ESA dose equivalents <16,000 units.
Authors: Marc A Pfeffer; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Chao-Yin Chen; Mark E Cooper; Dick de Zeeuw; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Jan M Feyzi; Peter Ivanovich; Reshma Kewalramani; Andrew S Levey; Eldrin F Lewis; Janet B McGill; John J V McMurray; Patrick Parfrey; Hans-Henrik Parving; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Ajay K Singh; Scott D Solomon; Robert Toto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ryan D Kilpatrick; Cathy W Critchlow; Steven Fishbane; Anatole Besarab; Catherine Stehman-Breen; Mahesh Krishnan; Brian D Bradbury Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Steven M Brunelli; Katherine E Lynch; Elizabeth D Ankers; Marshall M Joffe; Wei Yang; Ravi I Thadhani; Harold I Feldman Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Grace H Lee; Jessica E Miller; Elani Streja; Jennie Jing; John A Robertson; Csaba P Kovesdy Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Alexander Kainz; Julia Wilflingseder; Reinhold Függer; Reinhard Kramar; Rainer Oberbauer Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.782