BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Among hemodialysis patients, achieved hemoglobin is associated with Epoetin alfa dose and erythropoietin responsiveness. A prospective erythropoietin responsiveness measure was developed and its association with mortality evaluated. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data from 321 participants were used and randomized to the hematocrit normalization arm of the Normal Hematocrit Cardiac Trial. Subjects were to receive a 50% Epoetin alfa dose increase at randomization. The prospective erythropoietin responsiveness measure was defined as the ratio of weekly hematocrit change (over the 3 wk after randomization) per Epoetin alfa dose increase (1000 IU/wk) corresponding to the mandated 50% dose increase at randomization. The distribution of responsiveness was divided into quartiles. Over a 1-yr follow-up, Cox proportional hazard modeling evaluated associations between this responsiveness measure and mortality. RESULTS:Erythropoietin responsiveness values ranged from -2.1% to 2.4% per week per 1000 IU. Although subjects were similar across response quartiles, mortality ranged between 14% and 34% among subjects in the highest and lowest response quartiles (P = 0.0004), respectively. After adjusting for baseline prognostic indicators, highest versus lowest responsiveness was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.87). CONCLUSION: Lower erythropoietin responsiveness is a strong, independent predictor of mortality risk and should be considered when evaluating associations between clinical outcomes and potential prognostic indicators, such as Epoetin alfa dose and achieved hemoglobin values.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Among hemodialysis patients, achieved hemoglobin is associated with Epoetin alfa dose and erythropoietin responsiveness. A prospective erythropoietin responsiveness measure was developed and its association with mortality evaluated. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data from 321 participants were used and randomized to the hematocrit normalization arm of the Normal Hematocrit Cardiac Trial. Subjects were to receive a 50% Epoetin alfa dose increase at randomization. The prospective erythropoietin responsiveness measure was defined as the ratio of weekly hematocrit change (over the 3 wk after randomization) per Epoetin alfa dose increase (1000 IU/wk) corresponding to the mandated 50% dose increase at randomization. The distribution of responsiveness was divided into quartiles. Over a 1-yr follow-up, Cox proportional hazard modeling evaluated associations between this responsiveness measure and mortality. RESULTS:Erythropoietin responsiveness values ranged from -2.1% to 2.4% per week per 1000 IU. Although subjects were similar across response quartiles, mortality ranged between 14% and 34% among subjects in the highest and lowest response quartiles (P = 0.0004), respectively. After adjusting for baseline prognostic indicators, highest versus lowest responsiveness was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.20 to 0.87). CONCLUSION: Lower erythropoietin responsiveness is a strong, independent predictor of mortality risk and should be considered when evaluating associations between clinical outcomes and potential prognostic indicators, such as Epoetin alfa dose and achieved hemoglobin values.
Authors: Francesco Locatelli; Ronald L Pisoni; Christian Combe; Juergen Bommer; Vittorio E Andreucci; Luis Piera; Roger Greenwood; Harold I Feldman; Friedrich K Port; Philip J Held Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Charles J McAllister; Robert S Lehn; Grace H Lee; Allen R Nissenson; Joel D Kopple Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: A Rosati; C Tetta; J I Merello; I Palomares; R Perez-Garcia; F Maduell; B Canaud; P Aljama Garcia Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: J Glaspy; J Crawford; J Vansteenkiste; D Henry; S Rao; P Bowers; J A Berlin; D Tomita; K Bridges; H Ludwig Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 7.640