Literature DB >> 11675424

Death, hospitalization, and economic associations among incident hemodialysis patients with hematocrit values of 36 to 39%.

Allan J Collins1, Suying Li2, Wendy St Peter3, Jim Ebben2, Tricia Roberts2, Jennie Z Ma4, Willard Manning5.   

Abstract

Anemia treatment with epoetin has led to dramatic increases in hematocrit levels since 1989. Studies have demonstrated that morbidity and mortality rates are lower when hematocrit values are within the Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) target range (33 to 36%). Recently, clinical studies demonstrated that patients without cardiovascular disease exhibited lower morbidity rates and improved cognitive function with hematocrit values of >36%. One prospective trial, in contrast, demonstrated that normal hematocrit values among patients with cardiac disease were associated with higher mortality rates. These conflicting results have led to concerns regarding the risks and benefits associated with hematocrit values between 36 and 42%. To address these concerns, a recent cohort of 1996 to 1998 incident hemodialysis patients was studied, with assessments of the risks of death and hospitalization and the medical costs associated with hematocrit values of >36%. Patients survived at least 9 mo after dialysis initiation, and comorbidity, disease severity, and hematocrit levels were determined for months 4 to 9. Patients were grouped on the basis of hematocrit values, i.e., <30, 30 to <33, 33 to <36, 36 to <39, or > or =39%, with 1 yr of follow-up monitoring. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate all-cause and cause-specific mortality and hospitalization rates. The economic evaluations included analyses with Medicare Parts A and B allowable expenditures as the dependent variable and the same clinical characteristics as independent variables. For patients with hematocrit values of > or =36%, mortality rates were not different, hospitalization rates were 16 to 22% lower, and expenditures were 8.3 to 8.5% less, compared with patients with hematocrit values of 33 to <36%. These observations do not demonstrate causality. Additional long-term studies are needed to assess the risks of higher hematocrit values among all patients and patients with cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11675424     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V12112465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  53 in total

1.  Risk factors for high erythropoiesis stimulating agent resistance index in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients, stages 4 and 5.

Authors:  Ana de Lurdes Agostinho Cabrita; Ana Pinho; Anabela Malho; Elsa Morgado; Marília Faísca; Hermínio Carrasqueira; Ana Paula Silva; Pedro Leão Neves
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Anemia: To TREAT or not to TREAT--that is the question.

Authors:  Andrzej Wiecek
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Association of ESA hypo-responsiveness and haemoglobin variability with mortality in haemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Alexander Kainz; Bernd Mayer; Reinhard Kramar; Rainer Oberbauer
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 4.  Negative trials in nephrology: what can we learn?

Authors:  James E Novak; Jula K Inrig; Uptal D Patel; Robert M Califf; Lynda A Szczech
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Comparative effectiveness of two anemia management strategies for complex elderly dialysis patients.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Mae Thamer; James Kaufman; Dennis Cotter; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Anemia and cardiovascular disease in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Samy I McFarlane; Moro O Salifu; John Makaryus; James R Sowers
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Comparing the Effectiveness of Dynamic Treatment Strategies Using Electronic Health Records: An Application of the Parametric g-Formula to Anemia Management Strategies.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Jessica G Young; Mae Thamer; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Economic evaluation of sevelamer versus calcium-based phosphate binders in hemodialysis patients: a secondary analysis using centers for Medicare & Medicaid services data.

Authors:  Wendy L St Peter; Qiao Fan; Eric Weinhandl; Jiannong Liu
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  C.E.R.A. corrects anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Iain C Macdougall; Rowan Walker; Robert Provenzano; Fernando de Alvaro; Harold R Locay; Paul C Nader; Francesco Locatelli; Frank C Dougherty; Ulrich Beyer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Effects of the dose of erythropoiesis stimulating agents on cardiovascular events, quality of life, and health-related costs in hemodialysis patients: the clinical evaluation of the dose of erythropoietins (C.E. DOSE) trial protocol.

Authors:  Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.