Literature DB >> 20505963

Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars.

Klaus W Neuhaus1, Jonas Almeida Rodrigues, Isabel Hug, Herman Stich, Adrian Lussi.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the performance of two laser fluorescence devices (LF, LFpen), conventional visual criteria (VE), ICDAS and radiographic examination on occlusal surfaces of primary teeth. Thirty-seven primary human molars were selected from a pool of extracted teeth, which were stored frozen at -20 °C until use. Teeth were assessed twice by two experienced examiners using laser fluorescence devices (LF and LFpen), conventional visual criteria, ICDAS and bitewing radiographs, with a 2-week interval between measurements. After measurement, the teeth were histologically prepared and assessed for caries extension. The highest sensitivity was observed for ICDAS at D(1) and D(3) thresholds, with no statistically significant difference when compared to the LF devices, except at the D(3) threshold. Bitewing radiographs presented the lowest values of sensitivity. Specificity at D(1) was higher for LFpen (0.90) and for VE at D(3) (0.94). When VE was combined with LFpen the post-test probabilities were the highest (94.0% and 89.2% at D(1) and D(3) thresholds, respectively). High values were observed for the combination of ICDAS and LFpen (92.0% and 80.0%, respectively). LF and LFpen showed the highest values of ICC for interexaminer reproducibility. However, regarding ICDAS, BW and VE, intraexaminer reproducibility was not the same for the two examiners. After primary visual inspection using ICDAS or not, the use of LFpen may aid in the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Bitewing radiographs may be indicated only for approximal caries detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20505963     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0427-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  36 in total

1.  Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions.

Authors:  B Nyvad; V Machiulskiene; V Baelum
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Ji Wan Park; Brant W Hager; Malcolm V Brock; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries.

Authors:  A I Ismail; W Sohn; M Tellez; A Amaya; A Sen; H Hasson; N B Pitts
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.383

4.  Reproducibility of DIAGNOdent 2095 and DIAGNOdent Pen measurements: results from an in vitro study on occlusal sites.

Authors:  Jan Kühnisch; Katharina Bücher; Volkmar Henschel; Reinhard Hickel
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.612

5.  A clinical study of caries diagnosis with a laser fluorescence system.

Authors:  Elena Barbería; Myriam Maroto; Marcela Arenas; Cristina Cardoso Silva
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy of dental caries.

Authors:  K König; G Flemming; R Hibst
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.770

7.  Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination.

Authors:  K R Ekstrand; D N Ricketts; E A Kidd
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  In vivo diagnosis of fissure caries using a new electrical resistance monitor.

Authors:  A Lussi; A Firestone; V Schoenberg; P Hotz; H Stich
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars.

Authors:  K C Huth; K W Neuhaus; M Gygax; K Bücher; A Crispin; E Paschos; R Hickel; A Lussi
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Laser fluorescence device does not perform well in detection of early caries lesions in primary teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Mariana Braga; José Nicolau; Célia Regina Martins Delgado Rodrigues; José Cartos Pettorossi Imparato; Fausto Medeiros Mendes
Journal:  Oral Health Prev Dent       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.256

View more
  18 in total

1.  Diagnostic performance of a new red light LED device for approximal caries detection.

Authors:  Klaus W Neuhaus; Philip Ciucchi; Jonas Almeida Rodrigues; Isabelle Hug; Marta Emerich; Adrian Lussi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests using information theory for multi-class diagnostic problems and its application for the detection of occlusal caries lesions.

Authors:  Umut Arslan; Ergun Karaağaoğlu; Gökhan Özkan; Aydan Kanlı
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

3.  An in vivo and in vitro investigation of the use of ICDAS, DIAGNOdent pen and CarieScan PRO for the detection and assessment of occlusal caries in primary molar teeth.

Authors:  Terry Kuo-Yih Teo; Paul Francis Ashley; Chris Louca
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Traditional and novel methods for occlusal caries detection: performance on primary teeth.

Authors:  J F Souza; T Boldieri; M B Diniz; J A Rodrigues; A Lussi; R C L Cordeiro
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Proximal caries lesion detection in primary teeth: does this justify the association of diagnostic methods?

Authors:  D G Bussaneli; M Restrepo; T Boldieri; T H Albertoni; L Santos-Pinto; R C L Cordeiro
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Histological validation of ICDAS II and radiological assessment of occlusal carious lesions in permanent teeth.

Authors:  Andreas Braun; Lisa Marie Julie Charlotte Guiraud; Roland Frankenberger
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.634

7.  Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Patrick A Fee; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-08

8.  Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Lucy O'Malley; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-14

9.  Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth.

Authors:  Cağdaş Cınar; Didem Atabek; Mesut E Odabaş; Ayşegül Olmez
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.607

10.  Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.

Authors:  Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.