Literature DB >> 26286856

Proximal caries lesion detection in primary teeth: does this justify the association of diagnostic methods?

D G Bussaneli1, M Restrepo1, T Boldieri1, T H Albertoni1, L Santos-Pinto1, R C L Cordeiro2.   

Abstract

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the performance of visual exam with use of the Nyvad criteria (visual examination - (VE)), interproximal radiography (BW), laser fluorescence device (DIAGNOdent Pen-DDPen), and their association in the diagnosis of proximal lesions in primary teeth. For this purpose, 45 children (n = 59 surfaces) of both sexes, aged between 5 and 9 years were selected, who presented healthy primary molars or primary molars with signs suggestive of the presence of caries lesions. The surfaces were clinically evaluated and coded according to the Nyvad criteria and immediately afterwards with the DDPen. Radiographic exam was performed only on the surfaces coded with Nyvad scores 2, 3, 5, or 6. Active caries lesions and/or those with discontinuous surfaces were restored, considering the depth of lesion as reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under ROC curve were calculated for each technique and its associations. Visual exam with Nyvad criteria presented the highest specificity, accuracy, and area under ROC curve values. The DDPen presented the highest sensitivity values. Association with one or more methods resulted in an increase in specificity. The performance of visual, radiographic, and DDpen exams and their associations were good; however, the clinical examination with the Nyvad criteria was sufficient for the diagnosis of interproximal lesions in primary teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental caries; Dental radiography; Diagnosis; Fluorescence; Lasers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26286856     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-015-1798-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  41 in total

1.  Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions.

Authors:  B Nyvad; V Machiulskiene; V Baelum
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions.

Authors:  James D Bader; Daniel A Shugars; Arthur J Bonito
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.821

3.  Selection criteria for dental radiography.

Authors:  N J Smith
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1992-09-05       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 4.  The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Ji Wan Park; Brant W Hager; Malcolm V Brock; Marie Diener-West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Clinical detection of caries in the primary dentition with and without bitewing radiography.

Authors:  B Newman; W K Seow; S Kazoullis; D Ford; T Holcombe
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.291

6.  Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination.

Authors:  K R Ekstrand; D N Ricketts; E A Kidd
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  An in vivo comparison of radiographic and clinical examination with separation for assessment of approximal caries in primary teeth.

Authors:  T C Coutinho; C daRocha Costa
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Radiographic and laser fluorescence methods have no benefits for detecting caries in primary teeth.

Authors:  F M Mendes; T F Novaes; R Matos; D G Bittar; C Piovesan; T Gimenez; J C P Imparato; D P Raggio; M M Braga
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars.

Authors:  N Chawla; L B Messer; G G Adams; D J Manton
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  In vitro comparison of Nyvad's system and ICDAS-II with Lesion Activity Assessment for evaluation of severity and activity of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.

Authors:  M M Braga; F M Mendes; S Martignon; D N J Ricketts; K R Ekstrand
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  8 in total

1.  The validity of laser fluorescence (LF) and near-infrared reflection (NIRR) in detecting early proximal cavities.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Majid Akbari; Melika Mohammadi; Amir Fallahrastegar; Mona Najaf Najafi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Fluorescence devices for the detection of dental caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Patrick A Fee; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-08

3.  Detection of proximal caries using quantitative light-induced fluorescence-digital and laser fluorescence: a comparative study.

Authors:  Hyung-In Yoon; Min-Jeong Yoo; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  The effect of bitewing radiography on estimates of dental caries experience among children differs according to their disease experience.

Authors:  L A Foster Page; D Boyd; K Fuge; A Stevenson; K Goad; D Sim; W M Thomson
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  In vivo performance of near-infrared light transillumination for dentine proximal caries detection in permanent teeth.

Authors:  Ayşe Dündar; Mehmet Ertuğrul Çiftçi; Özlem İşman; Ali Murat Aktan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-08-28

6.  Negligible therapeutic impact, false-positives, overdiagnosis and lead-time are the reasons why radiographs bring more harm than benefits in the caries diagnosis of preschool children.

Authors:  Laura Regina A Pontes; Juan Sebastian Lara; Tatiane Fernandes Novaes; Julia Gomes Freitas; Thais Gimenez; Bruna Lorena P Moro; Haline C M Maia; José Carlos P Imparato; Mariana M Braga; Daniela P Raggio; Fausto M Mendes
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Helen V Worthington; Lucy O'Malley; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-14

8.  Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries.

Authors:  Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Philip Riley; Anne-Marie Glenny; Falk Schwendicke; Helen V Worthington; Janet E Clarkson; David Ricketts; Ting-Li Su; Anita Sengupta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.