Literature DB >> 18217803

Spatiotemporal dynamics of visual attention during saccade preparation: Independence and coupling between attention and movement planning.

Anna Montagnini1, Eric Castet.   

Abstract

During the preparation of a saccadic eye movement, a visual stimulus is more efficiently processed when it is spatially coincident with the saccadic target as compared to when the visual and the saccadic targets are displayed at different locations. We studied the coupling between visual selective attention and saccadic preparation by measuring orientation acuity of human subjects at different locations relative to the saccadic target and at different delays relative to the saccade cue onset. First, we generalized previous results (E. Castet, S. Jeanjean, A. Montagnini, D. Laugier, & G. S. Masson, 2006) revealing that a dramatic perceptual advantage at the saccadic target emerges dynamically within the first 150-200 ms from saccade cue onset. Second, by varying the validity of the spatial cue for the discrimination task, we encouraged subjects to modulate the spatial distribution of attentional resources independently from the automatic deployment to saccadic target. We found that an independent component of attention can be voluntarily deployed away from the saccadic target. The relative weight of the automatic versus the independent component of attention increases across time during saccadic preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217803     DOI: 10.1167/7.14.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  43 in total

1.  Bottom-up effects modulate saccadic latencies in well-known eye movement paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia van Stockum; Michael R Macaskill; Tim J Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-21

2.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Movement planning and attentional control of visuospatial working memory: evidence from a grasp-to-place task.

Authors:  M A Spiegel; D Koester; T Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-06

5.  Predictive adjustment of the perceived direction of gaze during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Masataka Suzuki; Yoshihiko Yamazaki
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 5.082

6.  Reach preparation enhances visual performance and appearance.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Bonnie M Lawrence; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Trans-saccadic repetition priming: ERPs reveal on-line integration of information across words.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.