Literature DB >> 17449069

Left frontal eye field remembers "where" but not "what".

Gianluca Campana1, Alan Cowey, Clara Casco, Inge Oudsen, Vincent Walsh.   

Abstract

Short-term memory of basic stimulus features seems to rely upon low-level functional components of the visual pathways. By using a repetition priming paradigm, we previously showed that visual area V5/MT is important for holding motion direction information, but not spatial position information. Here we extend our previous findings and investigate the possible locus of spatial position priming. We compare the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over right angular gyrus and left and right frontal eye fields on priming for spatial position and motion direction. TMS over left frontal eye field selectively and significantly reduced priming for spatial position but there was no significant effect of TMS over right parietal or right frontal eye field. These results suggest that FEF neurons are implicated in short-term memory storage of spatial position, and extend and support the idea that memory for basic stimulus features is retained within the sensory areas that respond to primary stimulus attributes. They add to a growing body of evidence that the frontal eye fields are involved in many visual functions independent of eye movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17449069     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  18 in total

1.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  The perceptual and functional consequences of parietal top-down modulation on the visual cortex.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Neil Muggleton; Nilli Lavie; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Cortical mechanisms for trans-saccadic memory and integration of multiple object features.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Michael Vesia; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  State-dependency of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Juha Silvanto; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Differential frontal involvement in shifts of internal and perceptual attention.

Authors:  Ryan T Tanoue; Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Disrupting Short-Term Memory Maintenance in Premotor Cortex Affects Serial Dependence in Visuomotor Integration.

Authors:  Raymundo Machado de Azevedo Neto; Andreas Bartels
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Modulation of activity in human visual area V1 during memory masking.

Authors:  Markus H Sneve; Dag Alnæs; Tor Endestad; Mark W Greenlee; Svein Magnussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Neural correlates of inter-trial priming and role-reversal in visual search.

Authors:  Christopher Rorden; Arni Kristjansson; Kathleen Pirog Revill; Styrmir Saevarsson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Frontal non-invasive neurostimulation modulates antisaccade preparation in non-human primates.

Authors:  Antoni Valero-Cabre; Nicolas Wattiez; Morgane Monfort; Chantal François; Sophie Rivaud-Péchoux; Bertrand Gaymard; Pierre Pouget
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The human frontal oculomotor cortical areas contribute asymmetrically to motor planning in a gap saccade task.

Authors:  Paul van Donkelaar; Yu Lin; David Hewlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.