Literature DB >> 15949513

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues.

Daniel T Smith1, Stephen R Jackson, Chris Rorden.   

Abstract

Humans are able to selectively attend to specific regions of space without moving their eyes. However, there is mounting evidence that these covert shifts of attention may employ many of the same brain regions involved when executing the eye movements. For example, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies show that the oculomotor region known as the frontal eye fields (FEF) are activated by the covert shifts of attention. However, it remains possible that the activations seen in these studies result from actively inhibiting eye movements rather than as a direct result of modulating perceptual processing. Here we provide direct evidence for the role of this region in endogenously driven spatial attention. We show that briefly disrupting the left FEFs with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) eliminated the slow response times associated with the invalid strategic cues when the target appeared in the right visual field. At first glance, our findings appear incompatible with the results reported by Grosbras and Paus (Grosbras, M. -H., & Paus, T. (2002). Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(7), 1109--1120) and we suggest this is likely due to the design differences. Specifically, we disrupted the FEF at the time of cue onset, rather than target onset. Taken together with the findings of Grosbras and Paus, our findings suggest that the FEF plays an early role in the inhibition of perceptual information. Furthermore, our findings complement work by Ro et al. (Ro, T., Farne, F., & Chang, E. (2003). Inhibition of return and the frontal eye fields. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 290--296) who report that stimulation of the frontal eye fields disrupts the inhibitory consequences of reflexive attention shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15949513     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  22 in total

1.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting.

Authors:  Chi-Fu Chang; Tzu-Yu Hsu; Philip Tseng; Wei-Kuang Liang; Ovid J L Tzeng; Daisy L Hung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Stephen R Jackson; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  Common neural mechanisms supporting spatial working memory, attention and motor intention.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Rapid enhancement of visual cortical response discriminability by microstimulation of the frontal eye field.

Authors:  Katherine M Armstrong; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Covert orienting of attention and overt eye movements activate identical brain regions.

Authors:  Bianca de Haan; Paul S Morgan; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  C-H Juan; N G Muggleton; O J L Tzeng; D L Hung; A Cowey; V Walsh
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Neural correlates of simple unimanual discrete and continuous movements: a functional imaging study at 3 T.

Authors:  Christophe Habas; Emmanuel Alain Cabanis
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Frontal eye field activity enhances object identification during covert visual search.

Authors:  Ilya E Monosov; Kirk G Thompson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Spontaneous microsaccades reflect shifts in covert attention.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Event-related potentials reveal rapid registration of features of infrequent changes during change blindness.

Authors:  Pessi Lyyra; Jan Wikgren; Piia Astikainen
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.