Literature DB >> 20501712

Frequency of malignancy seen in probably benign lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: findings from ACRIN 6667.

Susan P Weinstein1, Lucy G Hanna, Constantine Gatsonis, Mitchell D Schnall, Mark A Rosen, Constance D Lehman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of malignancy in probably benign lesions seen at magnetic resonance (MR) screening of the contralateral breast in patients with known breast cancer enrolled in American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) protocol 6667.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: ACRIN conducted a prospective multi-institutional MR imaging screening trial of the contralateral breast in women in whom breast cancer had been diagnosed recently. Each participating institution obtained institutional review board approval before patient accrual and was compliant with HIPAA. Informed consent was obtained from the patients. At enrollment, all women had negative clinical breast examination results and negative mammograms of the study breast. At image interpretation, radiologists scored lesions by using the Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. Of the 969 women who comprised the final study group, 106 were classified as having a BI-RADS category 3 lesion as their highest scoring lesion at MR imaging. There were 145 BI-RADS category 3 lesions in 106 patients.
RESULTS: In the 106 patients with at least one BI-RADS category 3 lesion, there were 37 masses (25.5%), 59 areas of nonmass enhancement (40.7%), and 47 foci of enhancement (32.4%). In two (1.4%) of these patients, no findings were reported. Eighty-three (78.3%) of the 106 patients had no evidence of malignancy in the study breast after 2 years of follow-up; the remaining 23 (21.7%) received a tissue diagnosis. Seventeen (16.0%) of the 106 patients elected to undergo biopsy. Biopsy was recommended in the remaining six patients (5.7%) on the basis of follow-up imaging findings. The biopsy results were benign in 18 (78%) of the 23 patients, whereas they showed atypical hyperplasia in two (9%). One (4%) of the 23 patients had ductal carcinoma in situ. Overall, malignancy was diagnosed in one (0.9%) of the 106 patients.
CONCLUSION: In a multi-institutional study, the frequency of malignancy in MR-detected BI-RADS category 3 lesions was 0.9% (95% confidence interval: 0.02%, 5.14%). Copyright RSNA, 2010

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20501712      PMCID: PMC2887932          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10081712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

1.  Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.

Authors:  I Vizcaíno; L Gadea; L Andreo; D Salas; F Ruiz-Perales; D Cuevas; C Herranz; F Bueno
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Paul Weatherall; David Thickman; Nola Hylton; Ellen Warner; Etta Pisano; Stuart J Schnitt; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell Schnall; Gia A DeAngelis; Paul Stomper; Eric L Rosen; Michael O'Loughlin; Steven Harms; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography.

Authors:  X Varas; F Leborgne; J H Leborgne
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results.

Authors:  C K Kuhl; R K Schmutzler; C C Leutner; A Kempe; E Wardelmann; A Hocke; M Maringa; U Pfeifer; D Krebs; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations.

Authors:  Peter R Eby; Wendy B Demartini; Sue Peacock; Eric L Rosen; Bridget Lauro; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

Authors:  I Millet; E Pages; D Hoa; S Merigeaud; F Curros Doyon; X Prat; P Taourel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Management for BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected in preoperative breast MR imaging of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Hye Mi Gweon; Nariya Cho; Soo-Yeon Kim; Hye Ryoung Koo; Mirinae Seo; Ajung Chu; Eun Ju Son
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy.

Authors:  Tatsunori Asada; Takayuki Yamada; Yoshihide Kanemaki; Keishi Fujiwara; Satoko Okamoto; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Auditing a breast MRI practice: performance measures for screening and diagnostic breast MRI.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Sara C Gavenonis; Tina Motazedi; Jessica Cott Chubiz; Elkan P Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Janie M Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Dual-energy computed tomography for evaluation of breast cancer: value of virtual monoenergetic images reconstructed with a noise-reduced monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Kanako Okada; Megumi Matsuda; Takaharu Tsuda; Teruhito Kido; Akihiro Murata; Hikaru Nishiyama; Kanako Nishiyama; Haruna Yamasawa; Yoshiaki Kamei; Mie Kurata; Mana Fukushima; Riko Kitazawa; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Interpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibility.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Kathleen S Madsen; Judith E Kalinyak; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  MRI appearance of invasive subcentimetre breast carcinoma: benign characteristics are common.

Authors:  Matthias Meissnitzer; D David Dershaw; Kimberly Feigin; Blanca Bernard-Davila; Filipe Barra; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Additional Workups Recommended During Preoperative Breast MRI: Methods to Gain Efficiency and Limit Confusion.

Authors:  Santo Maimone; Andrey P Morozov; Zhuo Li; Emily C Craver; Erin A Elder; Sarah A McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6667 trial: effect of breast MR imaging assessments and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Lucy G Hanna; Constantine Gatsonis; Mary C Mahoney; Mitchell D Schnall; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Concordance of BI-RADS Assessments and Management Recommendations for Breast MRI in Community Practice.

Authors:  Amie Y Lee; Laura Ichikawa; Janie M Lee; Christoph I Lee; Wendy B DeMartini; Bonnie N Joe; Karen J Wernli; Brian L Sprague; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.