Literature DB >> 12516649

Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature.

Charbel BouSerhal1, Reinhilde Jacobs, Marc Quirynen, Daniel van Steenberghe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the use of oral implants for the treatment of partially as well as fully edentulous patients has increased the past two decades, more specialized radiographic techniques have become available for the preoperative planning of oral implant placement.
PURPOSE: The goal of this article was to enable clinicians to select the appropriate imaging techniques when planning for oral implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This artide reviews the available literature about various imaging techniques and their indication for the preoperative planning of oral implants. The advantages and drawbacks of each technique are described. A dosimetric overview is given relative to different radiologic techniques used in various clinical situations.
RESULTS: For preoperative planning of implant placement, advantages and drawbacks of the available imaging techniques have been considered, which allows guidelines for image technique selection to be formulated based on the clinical situation provided, considering the diagnostic yield of each technique and the radiation doses involved.
CONCLUSIONS: From the available literature, it can be stated that many clinical situations demand the use of cross-sectional imaging techniques for optimal preoperative planning of implant placement. Nevertheless, such techniques are not required in cases in which the clinical examination reveals sufficient bone width and where standard radiographic examinations, such as intraoral and panoramic radiography, reveal adequate bone height and space for implant placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12516649     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  18 in total

1.  Appearance of the mandibular incisive canal on panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  R Jacobs; N Mraiwa; D Van Steenberghe; G Sanderink; M Quirynen
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Hsun-Wen Chang; Heng-Li Huang; Jian-Hong Yu; Yu-Fen Li; Ming-Gene Tu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Spatial relation between a rigid (digital) intraoral X-ray receptor and longitudinal axes of maxillary teeth.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Isabell von Rechenberg; Bernd d'Hoedt; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Full digital workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitations: a case report.

Authors:  L Arcuri; C Lorenzi; F Cecchetti; F Germano; M Spuntarelli; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-23

6.  Ex vivo radiographic tooth length measurements with the reference sphere method (RSM).

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Dan Brüllmann; Bernd d'Hoedt; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants.

Authors:  Y-K Kim; J-Y Park; S-G Kim; J-S Kim; J-D Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Detection of the genial spinal canal in atrophic mandibles with a CBCT: a cadaver study.

Authors:  F Birkenfeld; M Becker; M Sasse; V Gassling; R Lucius; J Wiltfang; M Kern
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Implant Bed Preparation with an Erbium, Chromium Doped Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet (Er,Cr: YSGG) Laser Using Stereolithographic Surgical Guide.

Authors:  Gülin Seymen; Zeynep Turgut; Gizem Berk; Ayşen Bodur
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

10.  Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations.

Authors:  R Pauwels; O Nackaerts; N Bellaiche; H Stamatakis; K Tsiklakis; A Walker; H Bosmans; R Bogaerts; R Jacobs; K Horner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.