Literature DB >> 20494004

Giant hiatal hernia.

Mohi O Mitiek1, Rafael S Andrade.   

Abstract

A giant hiatal hernia (HH) is a hernia that includes at least 30% of the stomach in the chest, although a uniform definition does not exist; most commonly, a giant HH is a type III hernia with a sliding and paraesophageal component. The etiology of giant HH is not entirely clear, and two potential mechanisms exist: (1) gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) leads to esophageal scarring and shortening with resulting traction on the gastroesophageal junction and gastric herniation; and (2) chronic positive pressure on the diaphragmatic hiatus combined with a propensity to herniation leads to gastric displacement into the chest, resulting in GERD. The short esophagus and GERD are key concepts to understanding the pathophysiology of giant HH, and these concepts are critical to address this problem appropriately. A successful repair of giant HH requires adherence to basic hernia repair principles (ie, hernia sac excision, tension-free repair), recognition and correction of a short esophagus, and a well-performed antireflux procedure. Recurrence rates for open giant HH repairs in expert hands range between 2% and 12%; large series have demonstrated that meticulous laparoscopic surgical technique can emulate the results of open giant HH repair. 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20494004     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  39 in total

1.  Durability of giant hiatus hernia repair in 455 patients over 20 years.

Authors:  P A Le Page; R Furtado; M Hayward; S Law; A Tan; S J Vivian; H Van der Wall; G L Falk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Hiatal hernia in pediatric patients: laparoscopic versus open approaches.

Authors:  Jung-Man Namgoong; Dae-Yeon Kim; Seong-Chul Kim; Ji-Hee Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

4.  Massive paraesophageal hernia mimicking pulmonary embolus.

Authors:  James J Lamberg; Michael Farbaniec; Ethan F Kuperman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; G Quero; A Lapergola; L Guerriero; C Fiorillo; S Perretta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  The first year is the hardest: a comparison of early versus late experience after the introduction of robotic hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Kimberly Washington; Jeffrey R Watkins; D Rohan Jeyarajah
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-25

7.  Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty.

Authors:  Oliver O Koch; Kai U Asche; Johannes Berger; Eva Weber; Frank A Granderath; Rudolph Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size: is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings?

Authors:  O O Koch; M Schurich; S A Antoniou; G Spaun; A Kaindlstorfer; R Pointner; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Use of computed tomography volumetric measurements to predict operative techniques in paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Angela M Kao; Samuel W Ross; Javier Otero; Sean R Maloney; Tanushree Prasad; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford; Paul D Colavita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A modified Nissen fundoplication: subjective and objective midterm results.

Authors:  Sabrina Rampado; Edoardo Savarino; Angelica Ganss; Giulia Pozza; Romeo Bardini
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.