Literature DB >> 31407111

Use of computed tomography volumetric measurements to predict operative techniques in paraesophageal hernia repair.

Angela M Kao1, Samuel W Ross2, Javier Otero1, Sean R Maloney1, Tanushree Prasad1, Vedra A Augenstein1, B Todd Heniford1, Paul D Colavita3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in diagnostic imaging capabilities, little information exists concerning the impact of physical dimensions of a paraesophageal hernia (PEH) on intraoperative decision making. The authors hypothesized that computerized volumetric analysis and multidimensional visualization to measure hiatal defect area (HDA) and intrathoracic hernia sac volume (HSV) would correlate to operative findings and required surgical techniques performed.
METHODS: Using volumetric analysis software (Aquarius iNtuition, TeraRecon, Inc), HDA and HSV were measured in PEH patients with preoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans, and used to predict the likelihood of intraoperative variables. Multidimensional rotation of images enabled visualization of the entire hiatal defect in a plane mimicking the surgeon's view during repair. The intrathoracic hernia sac was outlined producing volume measurements based on a summation of exact dimensions.
RESULTS: A total of 213 PEHR patients had preoperative CT imaging, with 14.1% performed emergently. Primary cruroplasty was performed in 89.2%, salvage gastropexy in 10.3%, and diaphragmatic relaxing incisions in 4.2%. Median HDA was 25.7 cm2 (IQR17.8-35.6 cm2); median HSV was 365.0 cm3 (IQR150.0-611.0 cm3). Incremental 5 cm2 increase in HDA was associated with greater likelihood of presenting emergently (OR 1.27; 95%CI 1.124-1.428, p = 0.0001), incarceration (OR 1.27; 1.074-1.499, p = 0.005), gastric volvulus (OR 1.13; 1.021-1.248, p = 0.02), and requiring either relaxing incision (OR 1.43; 1.203-1.709, p < 0.0001) or salvage gastropexy (OR 1.13; 1.001-1.274, p = 0.04). Similarly, HSV increases of 100 cm3 were associated with 23% greater likelihood of emergent repair (CI 1.121-1.353, p < 0.0001), and were more likely to require a relaxing incision (OR 1.18; 1.043-1.339, p = 0.009) or salvage gastropexy (1.19; 1.083-1.312, p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of CT volumetric measurements is a valuable adjunct in preoperative planning, allowing the surgeon to anticipate complexity of repair and operative approach, as incremental increases in HSV by 100 cm3 and HDA by 5 cm2 are more likely to require complex techniques or bailout procedures and/or present emergently.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT measurements; Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair; Paraesophageal hernia size; Predictive analytics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31407111     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06930-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  38 in total

Review 1.  Complications and results of primary minimally invasive antireflux procedures: a review of 10,735 reported cases.

Authors:  M A Carlson; C T Frantzides
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Use of mesh for hiatal hernia repair: a survey of SAGES members.

Authors:  Jason M Pfluke; Michael Parker; Steven P Bowers; Horacio J Asbun; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic gastropexy relieves symptoms of obstructed gastric volvulus in highoperative risk patients.

Authors:  Robert B Yates; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Andrew S Wright; Carlos A Pellegrini; Brant K Oelschlager
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty.

Authors:  Oliver O Koch; Kai U Asche; Johannes Berger; Eva Weber; Frank A Granderath; Rudolph Pointner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size: is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings?

Authors:  O O Koch; M Schurich; S A Antoniou; G Spaun; A Kaindlstorfer; R Pointner; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Brant K Oelschlager; Carlos A Pellegrini; John G Hunter; Michael L Brunt; Nathaniel J Soper; Brett C Sheppard; Nayak L Polissar; Moni B Neradilek; Lee M Mitsumori; Charles A Rohrmann; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Giant paraesophageal hernia repair: technical pearls.

Authors:  Mara B Antonoff; Jonathan D'Cunha; Rafael S Andrade; Michael A Maddaus
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  The massive hiatal hernia: dealing with the defect.

Authors:  Eduardo Ma Targarona; Carmen Balagué; Carmen Martinez; Jordi Garriga; Manuel Trias
Journal:  Semin Laparosc Surg       Date:  2004-09

9.  The size of the esophageal hiatus in gastroesophageal reflux pathophysiology: outcome of intraoperative measurements.

Authors:  Hasan Fevzi Batirel; Oya Uygur-Bayramicli; Adnan Giral; Bülent Ekici; Nural Bekiroglu; Bedrettin Yildizeli; Mustafa Yüksel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Assessment and reduction of diaphragmatic tension during hiatal hernia repair.

Authors:  Daniel Davila Bradley; Brian E Louie; Alexander S Farivar; Candice L Wilshire; Peter U Baik; Ralph W Aye
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

1.  Fundic gastropexy for high risk of recurrence laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and esophageal sphincter augmentation (LINX) improves outcomes without altering perioperative course.

Authors:  Robert Allman; James Speicher; Austin Rogers; Ethan Ledbetter; Aundrea Oliver; Mark Iannettoni; Carlos Anciano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  In vivo measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area using MDCT: description of the methodology and clinical validation.

Authors:  Ambria S Moten; Wei Ouyang; Sana Hava; Huaqing Zhao; Dina Caroline; Abbas Abbas; Chandra Dass
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09

3.  Impact of panniculectomy in complex abdominal wall reconstruction: a propensity matched analysis in 624 patients.

Authors:  Sharbel A Elhage; Matthew N Marturano; Eva B Deerenberg; Jenny M Shao; Tanushree Prasad; Paul D Colavita; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcomes and CT scan three-dimensional volumetric analysis of emergent paraesophageal hernia repairs: predicting patients who will require emergent repair.

Authors:  Sharbel A Elhage; Angela M Kao; Michael Katzen; Jenny M Shao; Tanushree Prasad; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford; Paul D Colavita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Measurement of hiatal surface area and other hiatus oesophageal diameters at computed tomography imaging in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and its relationship with hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Emrah Karatay; Mehmet Ali Gok; Mirkhalig Javadov
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.