Literature DB >> 20734068

Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty.

Oliver O Koch1, Kai U Asche, Johannes Berger, Eva Weber, Frank A Granderath, Rudolph Pointner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrathoracic wrap migration is the most frequent morphological anatomic reason for failure of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). This study investigates whether the size of the esophageal hiatus is a factor in reherniation after LARS with mesh hiatoplasty and after primary failed hiatal closure.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent a laparoscopic 270° Toupet fundoplication with simple sutured crura and posterior onlay of Parietex mesh prosthesis between October 2003 and June 2008 were evaluated with respect to the occurrence of postoperative intrathoracic wrap migration/reherniation. Indication for mesh hiatoplasty was a hiatus with a hiatal surface area (HSA) of at least 5.60 cm(2) or slippage after the first LARS. The integrity of repair was assessed using a barium swallow test. Cinematography was performed at a median of 25.6 months (3-63 months after operation) and was completed in 49 of 54 patients (90%). Follow-up was completed in 24 patients who underwent primary LARS (group A) and 25 patients who underwent a laparoscopic refundoplication (group B).
RESULTS: In group A, the occurrence of postoperative wrap reherniation was diagnosed in 20.8% of the patients, compared to 40% in group B. In both groups only one patient with recurrent hiatal hernia was symptomatic. In group A, patients who developed a recurrent hernia had a larger HSA than patients without postoperative reherniation. There was a huge difference in the size of the HSA between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with reherniation. In comparison, group B patients had HSA of similar size in all described cases.
CONCLUSION: In primary intervention, recurrence of hiatal hernia is more likely the larger the HSA is. The size of the hiatus is a major contributing factor to the possibility of reherniation. After failed primary hiatal closure, the size of the hiatal defect is no marker for the possibility of reherniation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20734068     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1308-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  37 in total

1.  Systematic use of gastric fundoplication in laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernias.

Authors:  F Casabella; M Sinanan; S Horgan; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Outcomes of laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  M Terry; C D Smith; G D Branum; K Galloway; J P Waring; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Reoperation after failed antireflux surgery.

Authors:  N A Rieger; G G Jamieson; R Britten-Jones; S Tew
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Short esophagus: analysis of predictors and clinical implications.

Authors:  O L Gastal; J A Hagen; J H Peters; G M Campos; M Hashemi; J Theisen; C G Bremner; T R DeMeester
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-06

5.  Laparoscopic prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  M A Carlson; C G Richards; C T Frantzides
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.588

6.  Laparoscopic antireflux surgery with routine mesh-hiatoplasty in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Frank A Granderath; Ursula M Schweiger; Thomas Kamolz; Martin Pasiut; Christoph F Haas; Rudolph Pointner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  C Gordon; J Y Kang; P J Neild; J D Maxwell
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  The esophageal hiatus: what is the normal size?

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; K Szabo; F A Granderath; G Syré; W Wayand; J Zehetner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Long-term results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E Soricelli; N Basso; A Genco; M Cipriano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Quality of life, surgical outcome, and patient satisfaction three years after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  Frank A Granderath; Thomas Kamolz; Ursula M Schweiger; Rudolph Pointner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  18 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Geoffrey Paul Kohn; Raymond Richard Price; Steven R DeMeester; Jörg Zehetner; Oliver J Muensterer; Ziad Awad; Sumeet K Mittal; William S Richardson; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic hernioplasty of hiatal hernia.

Authors:  Xuefei Yang; Rong Hua; Kai He; Qiwei Shen; Qiyuan Yao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-09

Review 3.  Treatment of giant paraesophageal hernia: pro laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; G Quero; A Lapergola; L Guerriero; C Fiorillo; S Perretta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Perioperative outcomes of surgical procedures for symptomatic fundoplication failure: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Sandeepa Musunuru; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Update on fundoplication for the treatment of GERD.

Authors:  Stefan Niebisch; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-06

6.  Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size: is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings?

Authors:  O O Koch; M Schurich; S A Antoniou; G Spaun; A Kaindlstorfer; R Pointner; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Use of computed tomography volumetric measurements to predict operative techniques in paraesophageal hernia repair.

Authors:  Angela M Kao; Samuel W Ross; Javier Otero; Sean R Maloney; Tanushree Prasad; Vedra A Augenstein; B Todd Heniford; Paul D Colavita
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  The Optimal Approach to Symptomatic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: Important Technical Considerations.

Authors:  Jessica A Zaman; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-10

9.  Safety of robotic assisted laparoscopic recurrent paraesophageal hernia repair: insights from a large single institution experience.

Authors:  Kendell J Sowards; Nicholas F Holton; Ekatarina G Elliott; John Hall; Kulvinder S Bajwa; Brad E Snyder; Todd D Wilson; Sheilendra S Mehta; Peter A Walker; Kavita D Chandwani; Connie L Klein; Angielyn R Rivera; Erik B Wilson; Shinil K Shah; Melissa M Felinski
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Multiplanar MDCT measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area: association with hiatal hernia and GERD.

Authors:  Wei Ouyang; Chandra Dass; Huaqing Zhao; Cynthia Kim; Gerard Criner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.