Literature DB >> 20490563

Cholecystectomy prevalence and treatment cost: an 8-year study in Taiwan.

Chiu-E Hsu1, King-Teh Lee, Chao-Sung Chang, Herng-Chia Chiu, Fang-Tse Chao, Hon-Yi Shi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study characterized the prevalence and treatment costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and open cholecystectomy (OC) procedures performed for a population-based patient cohort.
METHODS: This study analyzed 32,535 OC and 80,335 LC procedures performed in Taiwan from 1996 to 2004. The odds ratio (OR) and effect size were calculated to assess the relative change rate. Bootstrap estimation was used to derive 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for differences in effect sizes of LC and OC. Multiple regression models were used to predict total treatment cost.
RESULTS: The prevalences of OC and LC were respectively 18.19 and 25.44 per 100,000 persons in 1996. In 2004, OC gradually decreased to 13.21, but LC dramatically increased to 48.35, which represented change rates of -27.38% and 90.06%, respectively. The patient characteristics associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing LC were age, female gender, and lack of current comorbidities. The total treatment cost for the OC patients increased during the study period, whereas that for the LC patients declined. The LC patients were more responsive than the OC patients with respect to average length of hospital stay (ALOS) (-0.23; 95% CI, -0.33 to -0.13) and total treatment cost (-0.43; 95% CI, -0.63 to -0.23). Considerably increased total treatment cost was associated with advanced age, female gender, one or more co-morbidities, current treatment at a medical center, and long ALOS.
CONCLUSIONS: Decreases in ALOS and total treatment cost were greater for the LC patients than for the OC patients. Government officials and health care providers should understand that total treatment cost depends on both patient and hospital attributes. These results can be generalized to patient populations elsewhere in Taiwan as well as to other countries with similar patient profiles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490563     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Factors associated with prolonged stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  Shih-Ping Cheng; Yuan-Ching Chang; Chien-Liang Liu; Tsen-Long Yang; Kuo-Shyang Jeng; Jie-Jen Lee; Tsang-Pai Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.

Authors:  F Keus; J Wetterslev; C Gluud; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Do patient or hospital demographics predict cholecystectomy outcomes? A nationwide study of 93,578 patients.

Authors:  A M Carbonell; A E Lincourt; K W Kercher; B D Matthews; W S Cobb; R F Sing; B T Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Current status of surgical management of acute cholecystitis in the United States.

Authors:  Nicholas Csikesz; Rocco Ricciardi; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Early scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  F Chikamori; N Kuniyoshi; S Shibuya; Y Takase
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Trends of Heller myotomy hospitalizations for achalasia in the United States, 1993-2005: effect of surgery volume on perioperative outcomes.

Authors:  Y Richard Wang; Daniel T Dempsey; Frank K Friedenberg; Joel E Richter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Assessing patient-reported outcomes of cholecystectomy in short-stay surgery.

Authors:  Eva Maria Bitzer; Christoph Lorenz; Stefan Nickel; Hans Dörning; Alf Trojan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Nationwide volume and mortality after elective surgery in cirrhotic patients.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Louis N Nguyen; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status.

Authors:  L E Kazis; J J Anderson; R F Meenan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective piecewise linear regression analysis.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Meng-Han Tsai; Chong-Chi Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Analysis of gallstone disease after gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Tsung-Jung Liang; Shiuh-Inn Liu; Yu-Chia Chen; Po-Min Chang; Wei-Chun Huang; Hong-Tai Chang; I-Shu Chen
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Comparisons of prediction models of quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Jinn-Tsong Tsai; Wen-Hsien Ho; Chieh-Fan Chen; King-Teh Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.