Literature DB >> 12209324

Early scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis.

F Chikamori1, N Kuniyoshi, S Shibuya, Y Takase.   

Abstract

AIM: The present study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of early scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) for patients with acute cholecystitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 31 patients with acute cholecystitis were treated by early scheduled LC following PTGBD (group 1). These patients were compared with 9 patients treated by early LC without PTGBD (group 2) and with 12 patients treated by delayed LC following conservative therapy (group 3) for the success rate of intraoperative cholangiography, the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy, operative time, and hospital stay. Early scheduled LC following PTGBD was defined as scheduled LC when the patient's condition recovered and it was performed 1-7 days (mean: 4 days) after admission. The patients' age in group 1, 2, and 3 was 66 +/- 13, 65 +/- 10, and 64 +/- 9 years, respectively, without significant difference. Most of the patients had additional diseases.
RESULTS: The success rate of intraoperative cholangiography was 97% (30/31) in group 1, 67% (6/9) in group 2, and 67% (8/12) in group 3. The conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was 3% (1/31) in group 1, 33% (3/9) in group 2, and 33% (4/12) in group 3. The operative time for LC was 89 +/- 33 min in group 1, 116 +/- 24 min in group 2, and 135 +/- 30 min in group 3. The mean hospital stay after LC was 9 +/- 4 days in group 1, 9 +/- 3 days in group 2, and 17 +/- 7 days in group 3. In group 1, the success rate of intraoperative cholangiography was higher, the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was lower, and operative time was shorter than in groups 2 and 3 with significant difference (p <0.05, p <0.05, and p <0.01, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that early scheduled LC following PTGBD is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with acute cholecystitis especially in elderly and complicated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12209324     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9004-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Early versus delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Satoru Shikata; Yoshinori Noguchi; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Jeong Woon Kim; In Ho Jeong; Tae Yong Choi; Byung Moo Yoo; Jin Hong Kim; Myung Wook Kim; Wook Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy affects conversion rate of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Amitai Bickel; Rotem Sivan Hoffman; Norman Loberant; Michael Weiss; Arieh Eitan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  What is the optimal time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallbladder empyema?

Authors:  Yong Jin Kwon; Byung Kyu Ahn; Hwon Kyum Park; Kwang Soo Lee; Kyeong Geun Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is there an optimal time for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  D Soffer; L H Blackbourne; C I Schulman; M Goldman; F Habib; R Benjamin; M Lynn; P P Lopez; S M Cohn; M G McKenney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Efficacy of PTGBD for Acute Cholecystitis Based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018.

Authors:  Kodai Abe; Keiichi Suzuki; Masashi Yahagi; Takeru Murata; Hiroyuki Sako; Yoshiyuki Ishii
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Outcome of conservative percutaneous cholecystostomy in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and risk factors leading to surgery.

Authors:  Won Seok Jang; Jun Uk Lim; Kwang Ro Joo; Jae Myung Cha; Hyun Phil Shin; Sun Hyung Joo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Unusual cases of acute cholecystitis and cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines.

Authors:  Hideki Yasuda; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Yuji Nimura; Koichi Hirata; Yasutoshi Kimura; Keita Wada; Fumihiko Miura; Masahiko Hirota; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Masato Nagino; Yuichi Yamashita; Serafin C Hilvano; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2007-01-30

9.  Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not influenced by chronological age in the elderly.

Authors:  Hyung-Ook Kim; Jung-Won Yun; Jun-Ho Shin; Sang-Il Hwang; Yong-Kyun Cho; Byung-Ho Son; Chang-Hak Yoo; Yong-Lai Park; Hungdai Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results.

Authors:  Giuseppe Borzellino; Stefan Sauerland; Anna Maria Minicozzi; Giuseppe Verlato; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Giovanni de Manzoni; Claudio Cordiano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.