Literature DB >> 20489199

Sequence conversion by single strand oligonucleotide donors via non-homologous end joining in mammalian cells.

Jia Liu1, Alokes Majumdar, Jilan Liu, Lawrence H Thompson, Michael M Seidman.   

Abstract

Double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by homology independent nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) pathways involving proteins such as Ku70/80, DNAPKcs, Xrcc4/Ligase 4, and the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex. DSBs can also be repaired by homology-dependent pathways (HDR), in which the MRN and CtIP nucleases produce single strand ends that engage homologous sequences either by strand invasion or strand annealing. The entry of ends into HDR pathways underlies protocols for genomic manipulation that combine site-specific DSBs with appropriate informational donors. Most strategies utilize long duplex donors that participate by strand invasion. Work in yeast indicates that single strand oligonucleotide (SSO) donors are also active, over considerable distance, via a single strand annealing pathway. We examined the activity of SSO donors in mammalian cells at DSBs induced either by a restriction nuclease or by a targeted interstrand cross-link. SSO donors were effective immediately adjacent to the break, but activity declined sharply beyond approximately 100 nucleotides. Overexpression of the resection nuclease CtIP increased the frequency of SSO-mediated sequence modulation distal to the break site, but had no effect on the activity of an SSO donor adjacent to the break. Genetic and in vivo competition experiments showed that sequence conversion by SSOs in the immediate vicinity of the break was not by strand invasion or strand annealing pathways. Instead these donors competed for ends that would have otherwise entered NHEJ pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20489199      PMCID: PMC2906313          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.123844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  94 in total

1.  Characterization of mammalian RAD51 double strand break repair using non-lethal dominant-negative forms.

Authors:  S Lambert; B S Lopez
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks.

Authors:  M E Moynahan; A J Pierce; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Coupled homologous and nonhomologous repair of a double-strand break preserves genomic integrity in mammalian cells.

Authors:  C Richardson; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing.

Authors:  Eleni P Mimitou; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells.

Authors:  Zhiyong Mao; Michael Bozzella; Andrei Seluanov; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  ERCC1-XPF endonuclease facilitates DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Anwaar Ahmad; Andria Rasile Robinson; Anette Duensing; Ellen van Drunen; H Berna Beverloo; David B Weisberg; Paul Hasty; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Laura J Niedernhofer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas; Felipe Cortés-Ledesma; Alessandro A Sartori; Andrés Aguilera; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair.

Authors:  Nicole Bennardo; Anita Cheng; Nick Huang; Jeremy M Stark
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 6.020

9.  Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response.

Authors:  Christian Zierhut; John F X Diffley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Positive regulation of DNA double strand break repair activity during differentiation of long life span cells: the example of adipogenesis.

Authors:  Aline Meulle; Bernard Salles; Danièle Daviaud; Philippe Valet; Catherine Muller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Targeted gene therapies: tools, applications, optimization.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Luther Davis; Nancy Maizels
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Targeting of an interrupted polypurine:polypyrimidine sequence in mammalian cells by a triplex-forming oligonucleotide containing a novel base analogue.

Authors:  A Semenyuk; E Darian; J Liu; A Majumdar; B Cuenoud; P S Miller; A D Mackerell; M M Seidman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Preparation and application of triple helix forming oligonucleotides and single strand oligonucleotide donors for gene correction.

Authors:  Rowshon Alam; Arun Kalliat Thazhathveetil; Hong Li; Michael M Seidman
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

4.  Regulation of Gene Editing Activity Directed by Single-Stranded Oligonucleotides and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems.

Authors:  Pawel Bialk; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Bryan Strouse; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Human pluripotent stem cells: an emerging model in developmental biology.

Authors:  Zengrong Zhu; Danwei Huangfu
Journal:  Development       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Part I-mechanism of adaptation: high nitric oxide adapted A549 cells show enhanced DNA damage response and activation of antiapoptotic pathways.

Authors:  Madeeha Aqil; Kim M Elseth; Benjamin J Vesper; Zane Deliu; Bulent Aydogan; Jiaping Xue; James A Radosevich
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 7.  An update on targeted gene repair in mammalian cells: methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Nanna M Jensen; Trine Dalsgaard; Maria Jakobsen; Roni R Nielsen; Charlotte B Sørensen; Lars Bolund; Thomas G Jensen
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 8.410

8.  Combinatorial gene editing in mammalian cells using ssODNs and TALENs.

Authors:  Bryan Strouse; Pawel Bialk; Rohina A Niamat; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The position of DNA cleavage by TALENs and cell synchronization influences the frequency of gene editing directed by single-stranded oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Natalia Rivera-Torres; Bryan Strouse; Pawel Bialk; Rohina A Niamat; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Diversity of Genetic Outcomes from CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing is Regulated by the Length of the Symmetrical Donor DNA Template.

Authors:  Amanda M Hewes; Brett M Sansbury; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.