Literature DB >> 20486928

Survival analysis with error-prone time-varying covariates: a risk set calibration approach.

Xiaomei Liao1, David M Zucker, Yi Li, Donna Spiegelman.   

Abstract

Occupational, environmental, and nutritional epidemiologists are often interested in estimating the prospective effect of time-varying exposure variables such as cumulative exposure or cumulative updated average exposure, in relation to chronic disease endpoints such as cancer incidence and mortality. From exposure validation studies, it is apparent that many of the variables of interest are measured with moderate to substantial error. Although the ordinary regression calibration (ORC) approach is approximately valid and efficient for measurement error correction of relative risk estimates from the Cox model with time-independent point exposures when the disease is rare, it is not adaptable for use with time-varying exposures. By recalibrating the measurement error model within each risk set, a risk set regression calibration (RRC) method is proposed for this setting. An algorithm for a bias-corrected point estimate of the relative risk using an RRC approach is presented, followed by the derivation of an estimate of its variance, resulting in a sandwich estimator. Emphasis is on methods applicable to the main study/external validation study design, which arises in important applications. Simulation studies under several assumptions about the error model were carried out, which demonstrated the validity and efficiency of the method in finite samples. The method was applied to a study of diet and cancer from Harvard's Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS).
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20486928      PMCID: PMC2927810          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

1.  Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements.

Authors:  F B Hu; M J Stampfer; E Rimm; A Ascherio; B A Rosner; D Spiegelman; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Estimating long-term average particulate air pollution concentrations: application of traffic indicators and geographic information systems.

Authors:  Michael Brauer; Gerard Hoek; Patricia van Vliet; Kees Meliefste; Paul Fischer; Ulrike Gehring; Joachim Heinrich; Josef Cyrys; Tom Bellander; Marie Lewne; Bert Brunekreef
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Generalized additive distributed lag models: quantifying mortality displacement.

Authors:  A Zanobetti; M P Wand; J Schwartz; L M Ryan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Correction of logistic regression relative risk estimates and confidence intervals for measurement error: the case of multiple covariates measured with error.

Authors:  B Rosner; D Spiegelman; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale.

Authors:  E L Korn; B I Graubard; D Midthune
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Comparative validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute food frequency questionnaires : the Eating at America's Table Study.

Authors:  A F Subar; F E Thompson; V Kipnis; D Midthune; P Hurwitz; S McNutt; A McIntosh; S Rosenfeld
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer--a pooled analysis.

Authors:  D J Hunter; D Spiegelman; H O Adami; L Beeson; P A van den Brandt; A R Folsom; G E Fraser; R A Goldbohm; S Graham; G R Howe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-02-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  D Spiegelman; A McDermott; B Rosner
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  A prospective study of calcium intake and incident and fatal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Edward Giovannucci; Yan Liu; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.254

  10 in total
  26 in total

1.  There is no impact of exposure measurement error on latency estimation in linear models.

Authors:  S B Peskoe; D Spiegelman; M Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Hazard ratio estimation for biomarker-calibrated dietary exposures.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Proportional Hazards Model with Covariate Measurement Error and Instrumental Variables.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Measurement Error Case Series Models with Application to Infection-Cardiovascular Risk in OlderPatients on Dialysis.

Authors:  Sandra M Mohammed; Damla Sentürk; Lorien S Dalrymple; Danh V Nguyen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Marine ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer according to microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Mingyang Song; Reiko Nishihara; Kana Wu; Zhi Rong Qian; Sun A Kim; Yasutaka Sukawa; Kosuke Mima; Kentaro Inamura; Atsuhiro Masuda; Juhong Yang; Charles S Fuchs; Edward L Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino; Andrew T Chan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Quantifying risk over the life course - latency, age-related susceptibility, and other time-varying exposure metrics.

Authors:  Molin Wang; Xiaomei Liao; Francine Laden; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake.

Authors:  Laurence S Freedman; John M Commins; James E Moler; Lenore Arab; David J Baer; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Alanna J Moshfegh; Marian L Neuhouser; Ross L Prentice; Arthur Schatzkin; Donna Spiegelman; Amy F Subar; Lesley F Tinker; Walter Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 4. The Nurses' Health Study and Methods for Eliminating Bias Attributable to Measurement Error and Misclassification.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Origin, Methods, and Evolution of the Three Nurses' Health Studies.

Authors:  Ying Bao; Monica L Bertoia; Elizabeth B Lenart; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett; Frank E Speizer; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 10.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Helmut Küchenhoff; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.