Literature DB >> 12606891

Estimating long-term average particulate air pollution concentrations: application of traffic indicators and geographic information systems.

Michael Brauer1, Gerard Hoek, Patricia van Vliet, Kees Meliefste, Paul Fischer, Ulrike Gehring, Joachim Heinrich, Josef Cyrys, Tom Bellander, Marie Lewne, Bert Brunekreef.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As part of a multicenter study relating traffic-related air pollution with incidence of asthma in three birth cohort studies (TRAPCA), we used a measurement and modelling procedure to estimate long-term average exposure to traffic-related particulate air pollution in communities throughout the Netherlands; in Munich, Germany; and in Stockholm County, Sweden.
METHODS: In each of the three locations, 40-42 measurement sites were selected to represent rural, urban background and urban traffic locations. At each site and fine particles and filter absorbance (a marker for diesel exhaust particles) were measured for four 2-week periods distributed over approximately 1-year periods between February 1999 and July 2000. We used these measurements to calculate annual average concentrations after adjustment for temporal variation. Traffic-related variables (eg, population density and traffic intensity) were collected using Geographic Information Systems and used in regression models predicting annual average concentrations. From these models we estimated ambient air concentrations at the home addresses of the cohort members.
RESULTS: Regression models using traffic-related variables explained 73%, 56% and 50% of the variability in annual average fine particle concentrations for the Netherlands, Munich and Stockholm County, respectively. For filter absorbance, the regression models explained 81%, 67% and 66% of the variability in the annual average concentrations. Cross-validation to estimate the model prediction errors indicated root mean squared errors of 1.1-1.6 microg/m for PM(2.5) and 0.22-0.31 *10(-5) m for absorbance.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial fraction of the variability in annual average concentrations for all locations was explained by traffic-related variables. This approach can be used to estimate individual exposures for epidemiologic studies and offers advantages over alternative techniques relying on surrogate variables or traditional approaches that utilize ambient monitoring data alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12606891     DOI: 10.1097/01.EDE.0000041910.49046.9B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  121 in total

1.  Confounding and exposure measurement error in air pollution epidemiology.

Authors:  Lianne Sheppard; Richard T Burnett; Adam A Szpiro; Sun-Young Kim; Michael Jerrett; C Arden Pope; Bert Brunekreef
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Combining a road pollution dispersion model with GIS to determine carbon monoxide concentration in Tennessee.

Authors:  Eva Pantaleoni
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Spatio-temporal models to estimate daily concentrations of fine particulate matter in Montreal: Kriging with external drift and inverse distance-weighted approaches.

Authors:  Yuddy Ramos; Benoît St-Onge; Jean-Pierre Blanchet; Audrey Smargiassi
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  Spatial measurement error and correction by spatial SIMEX in linear regression models when using predicted air pollution exposures.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Raymond J Carroll; Brent Coull
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-11-29       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Screening and scenarios of traffic emissions at Trier, Germany.

Authors:  Jürgen Junk; Alfred Helbig; Andreas Krein
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Exposure to traffic related air pollutants: self reported traffic intensity versus GIS modelled exposure.

Authors:  J Heinrich; U Gehring; J Cyrys; M Brauer; G Hoek; P Fischer; T Bellander; B Brunekreef
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  The use of GIS to evaluate traffic-related pollution.

Authors:  D J Briggs
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  ESTIMATING DAILY NITROGEN DIOXIDE LEVEL: EXPLORING TRAFFIC EFFECTS.

Authors:  Lixun Zhang; Yongtao Guan; Brian P Leaderer; Theodore R Holford
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 9.  Socioeconomic Disparities and Air Pollution Exposure: a Global Review.

Authors:  Anjum Hajat; Charlene Hsia; Marie S O'Neill
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

10.  Prenatal exposure to traffic and ambient air pollution and infant weight and adiposity: The Healthy Start study.

Authors:  Anne P Starling; Brianna F Moore; Deborah S K Thomas; Jennifer L Peel; Weiming Zhang; John L Adgate; Sheryl Magzamen; Sheena E Martenies; William B Allshouse; Dana Dabelea
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.