Literature DB >> 19376490

Cervicoisthmic cerclage: transabdominal vs transvaginal approach.

Marili U Witt1, Saju D Joy, Jennifer Clark, Amy Herring, Watson A Bowes, John M Thorp.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the outcomes of cervicoisthmic (CI) cerclage using traditional transabdominal (TA) approach vs the lesser used transvaginal (TV) approach. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent placement of a CI cerclage.
RESULTS: Before CI placement, the abdominal group had a total of 100 pregnancies that continued beyond the first trimester and had 27 (27%) surviving infants. After cerclage placement, there were 34 pregnancies and 24 (71%) surviving infants. Before cerclage placement, the vaginal group had a total of 90 pregnancies that continued beyond the first trimester and had 11 (12%) surviving infants. After cerclage placement, there were 29 pregnancies and 20 (69%) surviving infants. The vaginal cerclage group had a significantly shorter mean operative time of 33 vs 69 minutes, and shorter hospital stay of 0.5 vs 3.2 days.
CONCLUSION: Both TV and TA CI cerclage offers select patients with cervical insufficiency improved neonatal survival. The TV placement of a CI has less morbidity than the TA approach with a comparable neonatal survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19376490      PMCID: PMC3157044          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

1.  TRANSABDOMINAL CERVICO UTERINE CERCLAGE DURING PREGNANCY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CERVICAL INCOMPETENCY.

Authors:  R C BENSON; R B DURFEE
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1965-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage.

Authors:  I A MCDONALD
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp       Date:  1957-06

3.  Transvaginal cervicoisthmic cerclage as an alternative to the transabdominal technique.

Authors:  F Golfier; K Bessai; P Paparel; A Cassignol; F Vaudoyer; D Raudrant
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Validity of indications for transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage for cervical incompetence.

Authors:  C L Cammarano; M A Herron; J T Parer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Transabdominal isthmic cerclage for the treatment of incompetent cervix.

Authors:  S Olsen; T Tobiassen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 6.  Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veena Zaveri; Fariba Aghajafari; Kofi Amankwah; Mary Hannah
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Cervical incompetence and cerclage in Denmark 1980-1990. A register based epidemiological survey.

Authors:  O Lidegaard
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Laparoscopic transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage during pregnancy.

Authors:  Chi-Heum Cho; Taek-Hoon Kim; Sang-Hoon Kwon; Jong-In Kim; Sung-Do Yoon; Soon-Do Cha
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  2003-08

9.  Transabdominal cerclage for fetal wastage due to cervical incompetence.

Authors:  M A Herron; J T Parer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Clinical aspects of cervical insufficiency.

Authors:  Frederik K Lotgering
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Sarah L Cohen; Thomas F McElrath; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

2.  The interval robotic transabdominal cerclage in a morbidly obese patient.

Authors:  Mete Güngör; Selim Afşar; Esra Özbaşlı; Canan Erdem Genim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-11-14

3.  Robot-Assisted Abdominal Cerclage During Pregnancy.

Authors:  Burak Zeybek; Amanda Hill; Gulden Menderes; Mostafa A Borahay; Masoud Azodi; Gokhan Sami Kilic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Abdominal cerclage in twin pregnancy after radical surgical conization.

Authors:  Ioannis Kyvernitakis; Fred Lotgering; Birgit Arabin
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.