Literature DB >> 27637677

Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage: a case report and literature review.

Gulden Menderes1, Lindsay Clark2, Masoud Azodi2,3.   

Abstract

We report a robotic-assisted, ultrasound-guided abdominal cerclage placement during pregnancy that resulted in term delivery, and review the current literature with respect to the efficacy of robotic-assisted transabdominal cerclage (RoboTAC) placement. The patient was a 25-year-old gravida 5 para 0-0-4-0 with cervical insufficiency who failed McDonald cerclage placement in two prior pregnancies, and presented at 13 weeks with a shortened (1.66 cm) cervical length. Placement of abdominal cerclage with robotic assistance under ultrasound guidance was performed at a teaching hospital. The main outcome measure was feasibility of RoboTAC placement in a gravid uterus under ultrasound guidance, and delivery of an infant ≥34 weeks of gestation with neonatal survival. Abdominal cerclage was safely and successfully placed at 13 weeks with robotic assistance. The patient had an otherwise uncomplicated antenatal course and was delivered via primary cesarean section at 38 weeks. Robotic-assisted abdominal cerclage can be considered for patients who require abdominal cerclage placement by skilled robotic surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal cerclage; Cervical insufficiency; Robotics

Year:  2014        PMID: 27637677     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-014-0462-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  23 in total

1.  Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage.

Authors:  I A MCDONALD
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp       Date:  1957-06

2.  A novel method for laparoscopic abdominal cerclage utilizing minimally invasive hydrodissection: a case report.

Authors:  Ramzi Aboujaoude; Paul Maloof; Manuel Alvarez; Abdulla Al Khan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.142

Review 3.  Robotic surgery.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 5.  Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy on skill acquisition and performance.

Authors:  Rosanne M Kho
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Robotic-assisted, ultrasound-guided abdominal cerclage during pregnancy: overcoming minimally invasive surgery limitations?

Authors:  Teresa M Walsh; Mostafa A Borahay; Karin A Fox; Gokhan S Kilic
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 7.  Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Veena Zaveri; Fariba Aghajafari; Kofi Amankwah; Mary Hannah
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Da Vinci-assisted abdominal cerclage.

Authors:  Larry Barmat; Gretchen Glaser; George Davis; Frank Craparo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic placement of transabdominal cerclage during pregnancy.

Authors:  Lynlee Wolfe; Stephen DePasquale; C David Adair; Carlos Torres; Shawn Stallings; Christian Briery; Christy Pearce
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cerclage in a pregnant patient.

Authors:  Adam J Fechner; Manuel Alvarez; Daniel H Smith; Abdulla Al-Khan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.